Incremental prognostic value of aortic stiffness in addition to myocardial ischemia by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

dc.contributor.author

Kaolawanich, Yodying

dc.contributor.author

Boonyasirinant, Thananya

dc.date.accessioned

2020-07-01T14:21:42Z

dc.date.available

2020-07-01T14:21:42Z

dc.date.issued

2020-06-11

dc.date.updated

2020-07-01T14:21:41Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. However, no data exists for the prognosis of combined aortic stiffness and myocardial ischemia. Using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, we assessed the association of aortic stiffness by pulse wave velocity (PWV), myocardial ischemia, and CV events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS:Velocity-encoded CMR was performed in 520 patients who had undergone adenosine stress CMR. The PWV was determined between the mid-ascending and mid-descending thoracic aorta. Patients were divided into 4 groups by PWV (higher or lower PWV) and myocardial ischemia (positive or negative ischemia). Combined CV events including mortality, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, coronary revascularization, and stroke were analyzed among the 4 groups. RESULTS:The median follow-up period was 46.5 months, and the median PWV was 10.54 m/sec. Myocardial ischemia was positive in 199 patients (38.3%). The group with a higher PWV and positive ischemia had the most CV events (hazard ratio 8.94, p <  0.001). The group with a higher PWV and negative ischemia also was significantly associated with CV events (HR 2.19, p = 0.02). Groups with a lower PWV-positive ischemia and a higher PWV-negative ischemia showed no difference in terms of CV events (HR 0.60, p = 0.08). Patients with myocardial ischemia who had higher PWV demonstrated significantly higher event rates than those who had lower PWV (HR 2.41, p <  0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that myocardial ischemia and PWV were independent predictors for combined CV events (HR 2.71, p <  0.001 and HR 2.42, p <  0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Stress perfusion CMR provided prognostic utility in patients with known or suspected CAD. Adding aortic stiffness to stress perfusion CMR could improve risk assessment and prediction for future CV events.

dc.identifier

10.1186/s12872-020-01550-w

dc.identifier.issn

1471-2261

dc.identifier.issn

1471-2261

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21109

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

BMC cardiovascular disorders

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s12872-020-01550-w

dc.subject

Aortic stiffness

dc.subject

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

dc.subject

Myocardial ischemia

dc.subject

Prognosis

dc.title

Incremental prognostic value of aortic stiffness in addition to myocardial ischemia by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

287

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

20

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Incremental prognostic value of aortic stiffness in addition to myocardial ischemia by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format