Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry

dc.contributor.author

Richards, A

dc.contributor.author

Staats, Janet

dc.contributor.author

Enzor, Jennifer

dc.contributor.author

McKinnon, K

dc.contributor.author

Frelinger, J

dc.contributor.author

Denny, Thomas Norton

dc.contributor.author

Weinhold, Kent James

dc.contributor.author

Chan, C

dc.date.accessioned

2017-06-01T19:51:56Z

dc.date.available

2017-06-01T19:51:56Z

dc.date.issued

2014-01-01

dc.description.abstract

The accurate identification of rare antigen-specific cytokine positive cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after antigenic stimulation in an intracellular staining (ICS) flow cytometry assay is challenging, as cytokine positive events may be fairly diffusely distributed and lack an obvious separation from the negative population. Traditionally, the approach by flow operators has been to manually set a positivity threshold to partition events into cytokine-positive and cytokine-negative. This approach suffers from subjectivity and inconsistency across different flow operators. The use of statistical clustering methods does not remove the need to find an objective threshold between between positive and negative events since consistent identification of rare event subsets is highly challenging for automated algorithms, especially when there is distributional overlap between the positive and negative events ("smear"). We present a new approach, based on the Fβ measure, that is similar to manual thresholding in providing a hard cutoff, but has the advantage of being determined objectively. The performance of this algorithm is compared with results obtained by expert visual gating. Several ICS data sets from the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) proficiency program were used to make the comparisons. We first show that visually determined thresholds are difficult to reproduce and pose a problem when comparing results across operators or laboratories, as well as problems that occur with the use of commonly employed clustering algorithms. In contrast, a single parameterization for the Fβ method performs consistently across different centers, samples, and instruments because it optimizes the precision/recall tradeoff by using both negative and positive controls. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.

dc.identifier.eissn

1872-7905

dc.identifier.issn

0022-1759

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14706

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of Immunological Methods

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.002

dc.title

Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

54

pubs.end-page

61

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Human Vaccine Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Immunology

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Duke Human Vaccine Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Statistical Science

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Surgical Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

409

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMID24727143.pdf
Size:
2.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format