Advancing Prone-Transpsoas Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review and Evolution of Indications with Representative Cases.

dc.contributor.author

Drossopoulos, Peter N

dc.contributor.author

Bardeesi, Anas

dc.contributor.author

Wang, Timothy Y

dc.contributor.author

Huang, Chuan-Ching

dc.contributor.author

Ononogbu-Uche, Favour C

dc.contributor.author

Than, Khoi D

dc.contributor.author

Crutcher, Clifford

dc.contributor.author

Pokorny, Gabriel

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Pollina, John

dc.contributor.author

Taylor, William

dc.contributor.author

Bhowmick, Deb A

dc.contributor.author

Pimenta, Luiz

dc.contributor.author

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M

dc.date.accessioned

2024-02-26T12:22:45Z

dc.date.available

2024-02-26T12:22:45Z

dc.date.issued

2024-02

dc.description.abstract

The Prone Transpsoas (PTP) approach to lumbar spine surgery, emerging as an evolution of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), offers significant advantages over traditional methods. PTP has demonstrated increased lumbar lordosis gains compared to LLIF, owing to the natural increase in lordosis afforded by prone positioning. Additionally, the prone position offers anatomical advantages, with shifts in the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus, reducing the likelihood of postoperative femoral plexopathy and moving critical peritoneal contents away from the approach. Furthermore, operative efficiency is a notable benefit of PTP. By eliminating the need for intraoperative position changes, PTP reduces surgical time, which in turn decreases the risk of complications and operative costs. Finally, its versatility extends to various lumbar pathologies, including degeneration, adjacent segment disease, and deformities. The growing body of evidence indicates that PTP is at least as safe as traditional approaches, with a potentially better complication profile. In this narrative review, we review the historical evolution of lateral interbody fusion, culminating in the prone transpsoas approach. We also describe several adjuncts of PTP, including robotics and radiation-reduction methods. Finally, we illustrate the versatility of PTP and its uses, ranging from 'simple' degenerative cases to complex deformity surgeries.

dc.identifier

jcm13041112

dc.identifier.issn

2077-0383

dc.identifier.issn

2077-0383

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30193

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

MDPI AG

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of clinical medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3390/jcm13041112

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

LLIF

dc.subject

PTP

dc.subject

deformity

dc.subject

fusion

dc.subject

prone-transpsoas

dc.subject

spine

dc.title

Advancing Prone-Transpsoas Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review and Evolution of Indications with Representative Cases.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

duke.contributor.orcid

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861

pubs.begin-page

1112

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
jcm-13-01112.pdf
Size:
4.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format