Predicting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Spine Surgery Using Risk Assessment Tools: a Systematic Review.
Date
2020-06
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Abstract
Purpose of review
The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature in patients undergoing spine surgery in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine to determine the available risk assessment tools to predict the patient-centered outcomes of pain, disability, physical function, quality of life, psychological disposition, and return to work after surgery.Recent findings
Risk assessment tools can assist surgeons and other healthcare providers in identifying the benefit-risk ratio of surgical candidates. These tools gather demographic, medical history, and other pertinent patient-reported measures to calculate a probability utilizing regression or machine learning statistical foundations. Currently, much is still unknown about the use of these tools to predict quality of life, disability, and other factors following spine surgery. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines that identified risk assessment tools that utilized patient-reported outcome measures as part of the calculation. From 8128 identified studies, 13 articles met inclusion criteria and were accepted into this review. The range of c-index values reported in the studies was between 0.63 and 0.84, indicating fair to excellent model performance. Post-surgical patient-reported outcomes were identified in the following categories (n = total number of predictive models): return to work (n = 3), pain (n = 9), physical functioning and disability (n = 5), quality of life (QOL) (n = 6), and psychosocial disposition (n = 2). Our review has synthesized the available evidence on risk assessment tools for predicting patient-centered outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery and described their findings and clinical utility.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
White, Hannah J, Jensyn Bradley, Nicholas Hadgis, Emily Wittke, Brett Piland, Brandi Tuttle, Melissa Erickson, Maggie E Horn, et al. (2020). Predicting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Spine Surgery Using Risk Assessment Tools: a Systematic Review. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 13(3). pp. 247–263. 10.1007/s12178-020-09630-2 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31378.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
![Tuttle](https://scholars.duke.edu/profile-images/thumbnail200/0384226.jpg)
Brandi Tuttle
Pronouns: She/Her/Hers
Research & Education Librarian
Medical Librarian for Research & Education at the Medical Center Library & Archives
Brandi serves as liaison to the Physician Assistant Program, the Pathologists' Assistants Program, and the Master of Biomedical Sciences Program. She develops and teaches classes, conducts systematic reviews, is engaged in research support and project consultation, conducts searches for IACUC, and co-directs the Evidence-Based Practice courses for physician assistant students.
- AHIP Distinguished level (Academy of Health Information Professionals)
- MS, Library & Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- BA, Anthropology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- AA, Sociology, Lake Land College
![Erickson](https://scholars.duke.edu/profile-images/thumbnail200/0398348.jpg)
Melissa Maria Erickson
I am a spine surgeon who provides surgical management of cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine conditions, including cervical myelopathy, herniated discs, deformity, stenosis, tumor and trauma. I provide both minimally invasive procedures as well as traditional surgical techniques.
![Horn](https://scholars.duke.edu/profile-images/thumbnail200/0724263.jpg)
Maggie Elizabeth Horn
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.