Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review
dc.contributor.author | Gabr, Mostafa A | |
dc.contributor.author | Touko, Elisabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Yadav, Amol P | |
dc.contributor.author | Karikari, Isaac | |
dc.contributor.author | Goodwin, C Rory | |
dc.contributor.author | Groff, Michael W | |
dc.contributor.author | Ramirez, Luis | |
dc.contributor.author | Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-25T20:39:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-25T20:39:12Z | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-01-25T20:39:11Z | |
dc.description.abstract | <jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review and meta-analysis. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes between stand-alone anchored spacers and traditional cages with plate fixation for dysphagia and pseudoarthrosis using data from clinical trials. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> Our search protocol was added to PROSPERO register and systematic review using PRISMA method was performed. Then, we systematically searched for studies addressing stand-alone anchored spacers in patients who underwent ACDF. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI), dysphagia incidence % (Dinc%), and Swallowing–Quality of Life (SQOL) scores during preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits were extracted. Chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for statistical comparisons ( P ≤ .05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The initial search generated 506 articles in CENTRAL and 40 articles in MEDLINE. Finally, 14 articles were included. Total number of patients was 1173 (583 anchored stand-alone and 590 plate). Dinc% scores were statistically significantly lower in the stand-alone anchored spacer compared to the plate-screw construct ( P ≤ .05). ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference in the comparisons of SQOL. On the other hand, NDI scores were statistically significantly lower in baseline of stand-alone anchored spacer and the plate-screw construct compared with both immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits ( P ≤ .05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p> Our study results revealed that the stand-alone anchored spacers were associated with less dysphagia in the immediate and last follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2192-5682 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2192-5690 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Global Spine Journal | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1177/2192568219895266 | |
dc.title | Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Gabr, Mostafa A|0000-0003-2058-2098 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Yadav, Amol P|0000-0002-4913-8006 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Goodwin, C Rory|0000-0002-6540-2751 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861 | |
pubs.begin-page | 219256821989526 | |
pubs.end-page | 219256821989526 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Staff | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Neurosurgery | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Cancer Institute | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.organisational-group | Radiation Oncology | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- 2192568219895266.pdf
- Size:
- 413.26 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version