Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

dc.contributor.author

Gabr, Mostafa A

dc.contributor.author

Touko, Elisabeth

dc.contributor.author

Yadav, Amol P

dc.contributor.author

Karikari, Isaac

dc.contributor.author

Goodwin, C Rory

dc.contributor.author

Groff, Michael W

dc.contributor.author

Ramirez, Luis

dc.contributor.author

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M

dc.date.accessioned

2020-01-25T20:39:12Z

dc.date.available

2020-01-25T20:39:12Z

dc.date.updated

2020-01-25T20:39:11Z

dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review and meta-analysis. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> To perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes between stand-alone anchored spacers and traditional cages with plate fixation for dysphagia and pseudoarthrosis using data from clinical trials. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> Our search protocol was added to PROSPERO register and systematic review using PRISMA method was performed. Then, we systematically searched for studies addressing stand-alone anchored spacers in patients who underwent ACDF. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI), dysphagia incidence % (Dinc%), and Swallowing–Quality of Life (SQOL) scores during preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits were extracted. Chi-square and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for statistical comparisons ( P ≤ .05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The initial search generated 506 articles in CENTRAL and 40 articles in MEDLINE. Finally, 14 articles were included. Total number of patients was 1173 (583 anchored stand-alone and 590 plate). Dinc% scores were statistically significantly lower in the stand-alone anchored spacer compared to the plate-screw construct ( P ≤ .05). ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference in the comparisons of SQOL. On the other hand, NDI scores were statistically significantly lower in baseline of stand-alone anchored spacer and the plate-screw construct compared with both immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits ( P ≤ .05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p> Our study results revealed that the stand-alone anchored spacers were associated with less dysphagia in the immediate and last follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5682

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5690

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19776

dc.language

en

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Global Spine Journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/2192568219895266

dc.title

Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Gabr, Mostafa A|0000-0003-2058-2098

duke.contributor.orcid

Yadav, Amol P|0000-0002-4913-8006

duke.contributor.orcid

Goodwin, C Rory|0000-0002-6540-2751

duke.contributor.orcid

Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861

pubs.begin-page

219256821989526

pubs.end-page

219256821989526

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Radiation Oncology

pubs.publication-status

Published online

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2192568219895266.pdf
Size:
413.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version