The Political Economy of Development in China and Vietnam

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014-05-11

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

92
views
1296
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Two theories predominate in discussions of why China and Vietnam have, over the past three decades, achieved such rapid economic growth. The first argues that their startling performance can be explained by economic factors associated with late industrialization. The second proposes that China and Vietnam represent novel models of political economic organization that need to be better studied and understood. In this essay we review the voluminous literature on the political economy of China and Vietnam, evaluating the critical debates over the economic benefits of decentralization, experimentation, and state-led development. Although the debate remains unsettled, analysis suggests that growth in the two countries was most robust during periods of state withdrawal from the economy and that current economic difficulties in both countries are now arising from the scale and character of the state's role in both economies. Copyright © 2014 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1146/annurev-polisci-041811-150032

Publication Info

Malesky, E, and J London (2014). The Political Economy of Development in China and Vietnam. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1). pp. 395–419. 10.1146/annurev-polisci-041811-150032 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17741.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Malesky

Edmund Malesky

Professor of Political Science

Malesky is a specialist on Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam. Currently, Malesky's research agenda is very much at the intersection of Comparative and International Political Economy, falling into three major categories: 1) Authoritarian political institutions and their consequences; 2) The political influence of foreign direct investment and multinational corporations; and 3) Political institutions, private business development, and formalization.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.