Patient Burden and Real-World Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Results from an Online Survey of Patients with Solid Tumors.

dc.contributor.author

Epstein, Robert S

dc.contributor.author

Aapro, Matti S

dc.contributor.author

Basu Roy, Upal K

dc.contributor.author

Salimi, Tehseen

dc.contributor.author

Krenitsky, JoAnn

dc.contributor.author

Leone-Perkins, Megan L

dc.contributor.author

Girman, Cynthia

dc.contributor.author

Schlusser, Courtney

dc.contributor.author

Crawford, Jeffrey

dc.date.accessioned

2021-01-01T17:56:22Z

dc.date.available

2021-01-01T17:56:22Z

dc.date.issued

2020-08

dc.date.updated

2021-01-01T17:56:21Z

dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION:Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression (CIM) is one of the most common dose-limiting complications of cancer treatment, and is associated with a range of debilitating symptoms that can significantly impact patients' quality of life. The purpose of this study was to understand patients' perspectives on how the side effects of CIM are managed in routine clinical practice. METHODS:An online survey was conducted of participants with breast, lung, or colorectal cancer who had received chemotherapy treatment within the past 12 months, and had experienced at least one episode of myelosuppression in the past year. The survey was administered with predominantly close-ended questions, and lay definitions of key terms were provided to aid response selection. RESULTS:Of 301 participants who completed the online survey, 153 (51%) had breast cancer, 100 (33%) had lung cancer, and 48 (16%) had colorectal cancer. Anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia were reported by 61%, 59%, 37%, and 34% of participants, respectively. Most participants (79%) reported having received treatment for CIM, and 64% of participants recalled chemotherapy dose modifications as a result of CIM. Although most participants believed their oncologist was aware of the side effects of CIM, and treated them quickly, 30% of participants felt their oncologists did not understand how uncomfortable they were due to the side effects of CIM. Overall, 88% of participants considered CIM to have a moderate or major impact on their lives. CONCLUSION:The data highlight that despite the various methods used to address CIM, and the patient-focused approach of oncologists, the real-world impact of CIM on patients is substantial. Improving communication between patients and health care providers may help improve patients' understanding of CIM, and foster shared decision-making in terms of treatment. Additional insights from patients should be obtained to further elucidate the totality of life burden associated with CIM.

dc.identifier

10.1007/s12325-020-01419-6

dc.identifier.issn

0741-238X

dc.identifier.issn

1865-8652

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21957

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Advances in therapy

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s12325-020-01419-6

dc.subject

Anemia

dc.subject

Chemotherapy

dc.subject

Myelosuppression

dc.subject

Neutropenia

dc.subject

Oncology

dc.subject

Online survey

dc.subject

Patient burden

dc.subject

Real-world

dc.subject

Symptom management

dc.subject

Thrombocytopenia

dc.title

Patient Burden and Real-World Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression: Results from an Online Survey of Patients with Solid Tumors.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

3606

pubs.end-page

3618

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Medical Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

37

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Patient Burden and Real-World Management of Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression Results from an Online Survey of Patients .pdf
Size:
460.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format