Quantifying the Importance of Upper Cervical Extension Reserve in Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery and Its Impact on Baseline Presentation and Outcomes.

dc.contributor.author

Passias, Peter G

dc.contributor.author

Mir, Jamshaid M

dc.contributor.author

Schoenfeld, Andrew J

dc.contributor.author

Yung, Anthony

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Diebo, Bassel

dc.contributor.author

Daniels, Alan H

dc.contributor.author

Line, Breton G

dc.contributor.author

Eastlack, Robert K

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, Gregory M

dc.contributor.author

Kebaish, Khaled M

dc.contributor.author

Mullin, Jeffrey P

dc.contributor.author

Fessler, Richard G

dc.contributor.author

Mummaneni, Praveen V

dc.contributor.author

Chou, Dean

dc.contributor.author

Hamilton, David Kojo

dc.contributor.author

Lee, Sang Hun

dc.contributor.author

Soroceanu, Alex

dc.contributor.author

Scheer, Justin K

dc.contributor.author

Protopsaltis, Themistocles

dc.contributor.author

Kim, Han Jo

dc.contributor.author

Buell, Thomas J

dc.contributor.author

Hostin, Richard A

dc.contributor.author

Gupta, Munish C

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, Eric O

dc.contributor.author

Riew, K Daniel

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Douglas C

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank J

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2025-06-16T19:31:32Z

dc.date.available

2025-06-16T19:31:32Z

dc.date.issued

2025-06-02

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The concept of upper cervical (C0-C2) extension reserve (ER) capacity, ER relaxation, and their impact on outcomes following surgical correction of adult cervical deformity (ACD) has not been extensively studied. We aimed to evaluate the impact of upper cervical ER on postoperative disability and outcomes. METHODS: Patients with ACD, from a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected multicenter database, undergoing subaxial cervical fusion with 2-year (2Y) follow-up data were included. ER was defined as: ΔC0-C2 sagittal Cobb angle between neutral and extension. Relaxation of ER was defined as the ER mean in those that met all ideal thresholds in radiographic parameters for Passias et al CD modifiers. We used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for confounding, with conditional inference tree approaches used to determine thresholds that affect postoperative ER resolution on patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients with ACD met inclusion. Preoperative C0-C2 ER was 8.7° ± 9.0°, and at last follow-up was 10.3° ± 11.1°. Preoperatively 29% of the cohort had adequate ER, whereas 60% had improved ER postoperatively, with 50% achieving adequate ER by 2Y. Lower ER correlated with greater CD (P < .05). Preoperatively, greater ER had lower Neck Disability Index (P < .001). Controlled analysis found improved ER to have a greater likelihood of achieving Neck Disability Index minimum clinically important difference (odds ratio 6.94, [1.378-34.961], P = .019). In those with inadequate ER at baseline, the preoperative C2-C7 of < -18° and T1 slope-cervical Lordosis mismatch of >59° for T1 slope-cervical Lordosis mismatch was predictive of ER resolution. In those with preoperative C2-C7 >-18°, a T1PA of >13° was predictive of postoperative return of ER (all P < .05). Surgical correction of C2-C7 by > 16° from baseline was found to be predictive of ER return. CONCLUSION: Increased preoperative use of the C0-C2 ER in CD was associated with worse baseline regional and global alignment and adversely affected health-related measures. Most of the patients had ER relaxation postoperatively. In those who didn't, however, there was a decreased likelihood of achieving satisfactory outcomes.

dc.identifier

00006123-990000000-01666

dc.identifier.issn

0148-396X

dc.identifier.issn

1524-4040

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32491

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1227/neu.0000000000003538

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

ACD

dc.subject

Adult cervical deformity

dc.subject

Complications

dc.subject

High-risk

dc.subject

Optimization

dc.subject

Outcomes

dc.subject

Upper cervical extension reserve

dc.title

Quantifying the Importance of Upper Cervical Extension Reserve in Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery and Its Impact on Baseline Presentation and Outcomes.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Passias, Peter G|0000-0002-1479-4070|0000-0003-2635-2226

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published online

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Quantifying the Importance of Upper Cervical Extension Reserve in Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery and Its Impact on Baseline Presentation and Outcomes.pdf
Size:
394.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format