Early Experience with Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion in Deformity Correction: A Single-Institution Experience.
| dc.contributor.author | Bartlett, Alyssa M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dibble, Christopher F | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sykes, David AW | |
| dc.contributor.author | Drossopoulos, Peter N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Timothy Y | |
| dc.contributor.author | Crutcher, Clifford L | |
| dc.contributor.author | Than, Khoi D | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhomwick, Deb A | |
| dc.contributor.author | Shaffrey, Christopher I | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-01T13:23:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-01T13:23:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Objectives: Lateral spine surgery offers effective minimally invasive deformity correction, but traditional approaches often involve separate anterior, lateral, and posterior procedures. The prone lateral technique streamlines this process by allowing single-position access for lateral and posterior surgery, potentially benefiting from the lordosing effect of prone positioning. While previous studies have compared prone lateral to direct lateral for adult degenerative diseases, this retrospective review focuses on the outcomes of adult deformity patients undergoing prone lateral interbody fusion. Methods: Ten adult patients underwent single-position prone lateral surgery for spine deformity correction, with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Results: Results showed significant improvements: sagittal vertical axis decreased by 2.4 cm, lumbar lordosis increased by 9.1°, pelvic tilt improved by 3.3°, segmental lordosis across the fusion construct increased by 12.2°, and coronal Cobb angle improved by 6.3°. These benefits remained consistent over the follow-up period. Correlational analysis showed a positive association between improvements in PROs and SVA and SL. When compared to hybrid approaches, prone lateral yielded greater improvements in SVA. Conclusions: Prone lateral surgery demonstrated favorable outcomes with reasonable perioperative risks. However, further research comparing this technique with standard minimally invasive lateral approaches, hybrid, and open approaches is warranted for a comprehensive evaluation. | |
| dc.identifier | jcm13082279 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2077-0383 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI AG | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3390/jcm13082279 | |
| dc.rights.uri | ||
| dc.subject | interbody fusion | |
| dc.subject | minimally invasive spine surgery | |
| dc.subject | prone lateral | |
| dc.subject | spinal deformity | |
| dc.title | Early Experience with Prone Lateral Interbody Fusion in Deformity Correction: A Single-Institution Experience. | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| duke.contributor.orcid | Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386 | |
| duke.contributor.orcid | Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861 | |
| pubs.begin-page | 2279 | |
| pubs.issue | 8 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
| pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Orthopaedic Surgery | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Neurosurgery | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| pubs.volume | 13 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- Early_Experience_with_Prone_La.pdf
- Size:
- 1.42 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format