Catalyzing development of best practice guidelines for community-managed health programs: Case study of a community-academic partnership

dc.contributor.author

Lopez, JCF

dc.contributor.author

Caragay, RN

dc.contributor.author

Sia, IC

dc.contributor.author

Madamba, JS

dc.contributor.author

Velasco, DC

dc.contributor.author

Lam, HY

dc.contributor.author

Estacio, LR

dc.contributor.author

Co, EEA

dc.date.accessioned

2022-12-24T05:27:51Z

dc.date.available

2022-12-24T05:27:51Z

dc.date.issued

2018-01-01

dc.date.updated

2022-12-24T05:27:50Z

dc.description.abstract

Background. There is a need to standardize community health practices, while still adhering to principles of community involvement, to ensure social acceptability and equitable access to health services. A set of Best practice guidelines (BPGs) were thus developed through a community-academic partnership (CAP) between the Integrative Medicine for Alternative Healthcare Systems Philippines, Inc. and its affiliated community-managed health programs (CMHPs), the University of the Philippines, and Bicol University. Objective. This study aimed to report the process and insights gained from the crafting of the BPGs. Methods. The BPGs were developed using a community-based participatory research approach and focused on top ten (10) diseases based on local prevalence and experiences of its CMHPs. Results. BPGs were developed for eight (8) communicable diseases (common cold/cough, influenza, measles, pulmonary tuberculosis, acute gastroenteritis, amebiasis, scabies, and intestinal parasitism); and two (2) noncommunicable diseases (diabetes and hypertension), which also provided information on signs and symptoms, initial referral criteria, management, and, where appropriate, specific use of medicinal plants, acupressure, and traditional massage. Emerging issues from this project include how community involvement led to the development of BPGs, the need to update its content, its potential application as a model for costing public health interventions, its anticipated benefits to health workers, the state of local health service delivery, and how the project epitomizes the ideal concept of community-academic partnerships. Conclusion. As a CAP project, this process holds promise as a catalyst for stakeholder engagement and health service delivery improvement. Further studies are necessary to map out other potential challenges and success factors, especially the socio-cultural, political, and health impact of CAPs.

dc.identifier.issn

0001-6071

dc.identifier.issn

2094-9278

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26390

dc.relation.ispartof

Acta Medica Philippina

dc.title

Catalyzing development of best practice guidelines for community-managed health programs: Case study of a community-academic partnership

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Lopez, JCF|0000-0002-8273-992X

pubs.begin-page

332

pubs.end-page

342

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Student

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

52

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lopez 2018 Catalyzing development of best practice guidelines.pdf
Size:
263.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version