Selectivity of physiotherapist programs in the United States does not differ by institutional funding source or research activity level.

dc.contributor.author

Riley, Sean P

dc.contributor.author

Covington, Kyle

dc.contributor.author

Landry, Michel D

dc.contributor.author

McCallum, Christine

dc.contributor.author

Engelhard, Chalee

dc.contributor.author

Cook, Chad E

dc.coverage.spatial

Korea (South)

dc.date.accessioned

2016-05-13T13:07:10Z

dc.date.issued

2016

dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare selectivity characteristics among institution characteristics to determine differences by institutional funding source (public vs. private) or research activity level (research vs. non-research). METHODS: This study included information provided by the Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE) and the Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy. Data were extracted from all students who graduated in 2011 from accredited physical therapy programs in the United States. The public and private designations of the institutions were extracted directly from the classifications from the 'CAPTE annual accreditation report,' and high and low research activity was determined based on Carnegie classifications. The institutions were classified into four groups: public/research intensive, public/non-research intensive, private/research intensive, and private/non-research intensive. Descriptive and comparison analyses with post hoc testing were performed to determine whether there were statistically significant differences among the four groups. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant baseline grade point average differences among the four categorized groups, there were no significant differences in licensure pass rates or for any of the selectivity variables of interest. CONCLUSION: Selectivity characteristics did not differ by institutional funding source (public vs. private) or research activity level (research vs. non-research). This suggests that the concerns about reduced selectivity among physiotherapy programs, specifically the types that are experiencing the largest proliferation, appear less warranted.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27079201

dc.identifier

jeehp.2016.13.17

dc.identifier.eissn

1975-5937

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/12018

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute

dc.relation.ispartof

J Educ Eval Health Prof

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.17

dc.subject

Accreditation

dc.subject

Licensure

dc.subject

Physical therapy modalities

dc.subject

Students

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Accreditation

dc.subject

Achievement

dc.subject

Educational Measurement

dc.subject

Financing, Organized

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Licensure

dc.subject

Physical Therapists

dc.subject

Physical Therapy Specialty

dc.subject

Private Sector

dc.subject

Public Sector

dc.subject

Research

dc.subject

School Admission Criteria

dc.subject

Schools

dc.subject

Students, Health Occupations

dc.subject

United States

dc.title

Selectivity of physiotherapist programs in the United States does not differ by institutional funding source or research activity level.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Covington, Kyle|0000-0003-4307-1135

duke.contributor.orcid

Cook, Chad E|0000-0001-8622-8361|0000-0002-5045-3281

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27079201

pubs.begin-page

17

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics, Physical Therapy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Difference in Selectivity and pass Rates_JEEHP_2016.pdf
Size:
238.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format