Quantitative cone contrast threshold testing in patients with differing pathophysiological mechanisms causing retinal diseases.

Abstract

Background

Cone contrast threshold testing (CCT) provides quantitative measurements of color and contrast function to reveal changes in vision quality that are not standard endpoints in clinical trials. We utilize CCT to measure visual function in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), epiretinal membrane (ERM), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

Retrospective data was gathered from 237 patients of the Gavin Herbert Eye Institute. Subjects included 17 patients with MS, 45 patients with AMD, 41 patients with ERM, 11 patients with RVO, and 123 healthy controls. Patients underwent the primary measurement outcome, CCT testing, as well as Sloan visual acuity test and spectral domain optical coherence tomography during normal care.

Results

Color and contrast deficits were present in MS patients regardless of history of optic neuritis. AMD with intermediate or worse disease demonstrated reduced CCT scores. All 3 stages of ERM demonstrated cone contrast deficits. Despite restoration of visual acuity, RVO-affected eyes demonstrated poorer CCT performance than unaffected fellow eyes.

Conclusions

CCT demonstrates color and contrast deficits for multiple retinal diseases with differing pathophysiology. Further prospective studies of CCT in other disease states and with larger samples sizes is warranted.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1186/s40942-023-00442-3

Publication Info

White, Kayla M, Itamar Livnat, Caroline R Frambach, John Doan, Urmi V Mehta, Clara Yuh, Anton M Palma, Kimberly A Jameson, et al. (2023). Quantitative cone contrast threshold testing in patients with differing pathophysiological mechanisms causing retinal diseases. International journal of retina and vitreous, 9(1). p. 9. 10.1186/s40942-023-00442-3 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/26671.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.