Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, Michael P | |
dc.contributor.author | Kallen, Michael A | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaffrey, Christopher I | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Justin S | |
dc.contributor.author | Burton, Douglas C | |
dc.contributor.author | Ames, Christopher P | |
dc.contributor.author | Lafage, Virginie | |
dc.contributor.author | Schwab, Frank J | |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Han Jo | |
dc.contributor.author | Klineberg, Eric O | |
dc.contributor.author | Bess, Shay | |
dc.contributor.author | International Spine Study Group | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-20T13:21:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-20T13:21:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06-01 | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-06-20T13:21:56Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE After using PROsetta Stone crosswalk tables to calculate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores, the authors sought to examine 1) correlations with Scoliosis Research Society–22r (SRS-22r) scores, 2) responsiveness to change, and 3) the relationship between baseline scores and 2-year follow-up scores in adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS PROsetta Stone crosswalk tables were used to converted SF-36 scores to PROMIS scores for pain and physical function in a cohort of ASD patients with 2-year follow-up. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate the relationship of PROMIS scores with SRS-22r scores. Effect size (ES) and adjusted standardized response mean (aSRM) were used to assess responsiveness to change. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between baseline scores and 2-year follow-up scores. RESULTS In total, 425 (425/625, 68%) patients met inclusion criteria. Strong correlations (all |r| > 0.7, p < 0.001) were found between baseline and 2-year PROMIS values and corresponding SRS-22r domain scores. PROMIS-PI showed a large ES (1.09) and aSRM (0.88), indicating good responsiveness to change. PROMIS-PF showed a moderate ES (0.52) and moderate aSRM (0.69), indicating a moderate responsiveness to change. Patients with greater baseline pain complaints were associated with greater pain improvement at 2 years for both SRS-22r Pain (B = 0.39, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-PI (B = 0.45, p < 0.001). Higher functional scores at baseline were associated with greater average improvements in both SRS-22r Activity (B = 0.62, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-PF (B = 0.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The authors found strong correlations between the SRS-22r Pain and Activity domains with corresponding PROMIS-PI and -PF scores. Pain measurements showed similar and strong ES and aSRM while the function measurements showed similar, moderate ES and aSRM at 2-year follow-up. These data support further exploration of the use of PROMIS–computer adaptive test instruments in ASD. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1547-5654 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1547-5646 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.publisher | Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG) | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181014 | |
dc.title | Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386 | |
pubs.begin-page | 801 | |
pubs.end-page | 806 | |
pubs.issue | 6 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Orthopaedic Surgery | |
pubs.organisational-group | Neurosurgery | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 30 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity.pdf
- Size:
- 1.82 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format