Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity

dc.contributor.author

Kelly, Michael P

dc.contributor.author

Kallen, Michael A

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Douglas C

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank J

dc.contributor.author

Kim, Han Jo

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, Eric O

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2023-06-20T13:21:56Z

dc.date.available

2023-06-20T13:21:56Z

dc.date.issued

2019-06-01

dc.date.updated

2023-06-20T13:21:56Z

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE After using PROsetta Stone crosswalk tables to calculate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores, the authors sought to examine 1) correlations with Scoliosis Research Society–22r (SRS-22r) scores, 2) responsiveness to change, and 3) the relationship between baseline scores and 2-year follow-up scores in adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS PROsetta Stone crosswalk tables were used to converted SF-36 scores to PROMIS scores for pain and physical function in a cohort of ASD patients with 2-year follow-up. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate the relationship of PROMIS scores with SRS-22r scores. Effect size (ES) and adjusted standardized response mean (aSRM) were used to assess responsiveness to change. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between baseline scores and 2-year follow-up scores. RESULTS In total, 425 (425/625, 68%) patients met inclusion criteria. Strong correlations (all |r| > 0.7, p < 0.001) were found between baseline and 2-year PROMIS values and corresponding SRS-22r domain scores. PROMIS-PI showed a large ES (1.09) and aSRM (0.88), indicating good responsiveness to change. PROMIS-PF showed a moderate ES (0.52) and moderate aSRM (0.69), indicating a moderate responsiveness to change. Patients with greater baseline pain complaints were associated with greater pain improvement at 2 years for both SRS-22r Pain (B = 0.39, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-PI (B = 0.45, p < 0.001). Higher functional scores at baseline were associated with greater average improvements in both SRS-22r Activity (B = 0.62, p < 0.001) and PROMIS-PF (B = 0.40, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The authors found strong correlations between the SRS-22r Pain and Activity domains with corresponding PROMIS-PI and -PF scores. Pain measurements showed similar and strong ES and aSRM while the function measurements showed similar, moderate ES and aSRM at 2-year follow-up. These data support further exploration of the use of PROMIS–computer adaptive test instruments in ASD.

dc.identifier.issn

1547-5654

dc.identifier.issn

1547-5646

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28203

dc.publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3171/2018.11.SPINE181014

dc.title

Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

801

pubs.end-page

806

pubs.issue

6

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

30

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Examining the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System versus the Scoliosis Research Society–22r in adult spinal deformity.pdf
Size:
1.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format