Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?

dc.contributor.author

Patel, Vaishali

dc.contributor.author

Jowell, Paul

dc.contributor.author

Obando, Jorge

dc.contributor.author

Guy, Cynthia D

dc.contributor.author

Burbridge, Rebecca A

dc.coverage.spatial

Germany

dc.date.accessioned

2017-05-01T18:00:06Z

dc.date.accessioned

2018-01-22T17:13:23Z

dc.date.available

2018-01-22T17:13:23Z

dc.date.issued

2016-12

dc.description.abstract

Background and study aims: It is common practice to perform ampullectomy without endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for ampullary lesions < 1 cm but no data exists to support it. No studies have explored whether EUS findings of invasion correlate with malignancy or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) on pathology. We explored the association between adenoma size, pathology results, and invasion on EUS.  Patients and methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study at a large tertiary care academic hospital. Chart review was performed for 161 patients with benign ampullary lesions on endoscopic biopsy (identified by pathology records). The primary outcomes were mean size (mm) of adenomas and pathology findings with and without intraductal and/or duodenal wall invasion on EUS.  Results: Invasion was identified by EUS in 41 (34.1 %) of 120 patients who underwent EUS. The mean size of the lesion in these patients was 20.9 mm (± 11.6 mm) compared to 13.9 mm (± 11.3 mm, P = 0.0001) in patients without invasion. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC 0.73, 95 % CI 0.63 - 0.83) revealed 100 % sensitivity for absence of invasion on EUS in lesions less than 6.5 mm. Invasion on EUS had sensitivity of 63.0 % (95 % CI 47.0 % - 77.0 %) and specificity 88.0 % (95 % CI 78.0 % - 95.0 %) for presence of malignancy, HGD or invasion on pathology. Conclusions: EUS should be considered for ampullary lesions > 6.5 mm. This study provides evidence to support the practice of ampullectomy without EUS for smaller adenomas. EUS evidence of invasion is highly specific for pathologic malignancy, HGD, or invasion (which preclude endoscopic ampullectomy).

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995195

dc.identifier.issn

2364-3722

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/16011

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

dc.relation.ispartof

Endosc Int Open

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1055/s-0042-121001

dc.relation.replaces

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/14246

dc.relation.replaces

10161/14246

dc.title

Does ampullary adenoma size predict invasion on EUS? Does invasion on EUS predict presence of malignancy?

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995195

pubs.begin-page

E1313

pubs.end-page

E1318

pubs.issue

12

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Gastroenterology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

4

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Does+ampullary+adenoma+size+predict+invasion+on+EUS%3F+Does+invasion+on+EUS+predict+presence+of+malignancy%3F.pdf
Size:
377.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version