Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.
dc.contributor.author | Heaney, Christopher | |
dc.contributor.author | Tindall, Genevieve | |
dc.contributor.author | Lucas, Joe | |
dc.contributor.author | Haga, Susanne B | |
dc.coverage.spatial | United States | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-15T16:46:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-12 | |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND/AIMS: as genetic and genomic research proliferates, debate has ensued about returning results to participants. In addition to consideration of the benefits and harms to participants, researchers must also consider the logistical and financial feasibility of returning research results. However, little data exist of actual researcher practices. METHODS: we conducted an online survey of 446 corresponding authors of genetic/genomic studies conducted in the United States and published in 2006-2007 to assess the frequency with which they considered, offered to, or actually returned research results, what factors influenced these decisions, and the method of communicating results. RESULTS: the response rate was 24% (105/446). Fifty-four percent of respondents considered the issue of returning research results to participants, 28% offered to return individual research results, and 24% actually returned individual research results. Of those who considered the issue of returning research results during the study planning phase, the most common factors considered were whether research results were deemed clinically useful (18%) and respect for participants (13%). Researchers who had a medical degree and conducted studies on children were significantly more likely to offer to return or actually return individual results compared to those with a Ph.D. only. CONCLUSIONS: we speculate that issues associated with clinical validity and respect for participants dominated concerns of time and expense given the prominent and continuing ethical debates surrounding genetics and genomics research. The substantial number of researchers who did not consider returning research results suggests that researchers and institutional review boards need to devote more attention to a topic about which research participants are interested. | |
dc.description.version | Version of Record | |
dc.identifier | ||
dc.identifier.eissn | 1945-0257 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Mary Ann Liebert Inc | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Genet Test Mol Biomarkers | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0066 | |
dc.relation.journal | Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers | |
dc.subject | Access to Information | |
dc.subject | Data Collection | |
dc.subject | Genetic Research | |
dc.subject | Genetic Testing | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Professional Practice | |
dc.subject | Research Personnel | |
dc.subject | United States | |
dc.title | Researcher practices on returning genetic research results. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Haga, Susanne B|0000-0001-8817-7406 | |
duke.date.pubdate | 2010-12-0 | |
duke.description.issue | 6 | |
duke.description.volume | 14 | |
pubs.author-url | ||
pubs.begin-page | 821 | |
pubs.end-page | 827 | |
pubs.issue | 6 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Basic Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Biostatistics & Bioinformatics | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Science & Society | |
pubs.organisational-group | Initiatives | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Provost's Academic Units | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Medicine, General Internal Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Sanford School of Public Policy | |
pubs.organisational-group | Sanford School of Public Policy - Secondary Group | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Social Science Research Institute | |
pubs.organisational-group | University Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 14 |