The Market-Based Lead Phasedown

dc.contributor.author

Newell, R

dc.contributor.author

Rogers, K

dc.date.accessioned

2013-05-16T00:26:32Z

dc.date.issued

2006-10-01

dc.description.abstract

© 2007 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.This essay uses the case study of the phasedown of lead gasoline in the United States to argue that market-based instruments can be effective in meeting environmental objectives at a lower cost than uniform standards, and can do so more quickly where permit banking is allowed. The performance of the lead phasedown program is assessed along several dimensions, including its overall effectiveness, static and dynamic efficiency, revelation of costs, and distributional effects. It is argued that the program likely saved hundreds of millions of dollars over policies that would not have allowed trading and banking, and also provided incentives for the development of new technology.

dc.identifier.isbn

9780199783694

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7372

dc.publisher

Oxford University Press, USA

dc.relation.ispartof

Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189650.003.0007

dc.title

The Market-Based Lead Phasedown

dc.type

Book section

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Economics

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
NewellRogersOxfordPress.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version