Improving acute myocardial infarction care in northern Tanzania: barrier identification and implementation strategy mapping.

dc.contributor.author

Hertz, Julian T

dc.contributor.author

Sakita, Francis M

dc.contributor.author

Prattipati, Sainikitha

dc.contributor.author

Coaxum, Lauren

dc.contributor.author

Tarimo, Tumsifu G

dc.contributor.author

Kweka, Godfrey L

dc.contributor.author

Mlangi, Jerome J

dc.contributor.author

Stark, Kristen

dc.contributor.author

Thielman, Nathan M

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Bettger, Janet P

dc.date.accessioned

2024-06-27T19:56:09Z

dc.date.available

2024-06-27T19:56:09Z

dc.date.issued

2024-03

dc.description.abstract

Background

Evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces morbidity and mortality. Prior studies in Tanzania identified substantial gaps in the uptake of evidence-based AMI care. Implementation science has been used to improve uptake of evidence-based AMI care in high-income settings, but interventions to improve quality of AMI care have not been studied in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from key stakeholder groups (patients, providers, and healthcare administrators) in northern Tanzania. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted using a guide informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interview transcripts were coded to identify barriers to AMI care, using the 39 CFIR constructs. Barriers relevant to emergency department (ED) AMI care were retained, and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool was used to match barriers with Level 1 recommendations for targeted implementation strategies.

Results

Thirty key stakeholders, including 10 patients, 10 providers, and 10 healthcare administrators were enrolled. Thematic analysis identified 11 barriers to ED-based AMI care: complexity of AMI care, cost of high-quality AMI care, local hospital culture, insufficient diagnostic and therapeutic resources, inadequate provider training, limited patient knowledge of AMI, need for formal implementation leaders, need for dedicated champions, failure to provide high-quality care, poor provider-patient communication, and inefficient ED systems. Seven of these barriers had 5 strong ERIC recommendations: access new funding, identify and prepare champions, conduct educational meetings, develop educational materials, and distribute educational materials.

Conclusions

Multiple barriers across several domains limit the uptake of evidence-based AMI care in northern Tanzania. The CFIR-ERIC mapping approach identified several targeted implementation strategies for addressing these barriers. A multi-component intervention is planned to improve uptake of evidence-based AMI care in Tanzania.
dc.identifier

10.1186/s12913-024-10831-5

dc.identifier.issn

1472-6963

dc.identifier.issn

1472-6963

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31218

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

BMC health services research

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s12913-024-10831-5

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Myocardial Infarction

dc.subject

Delivery of Health Care

dc.subject

Quality of Health Care

dc.subject

Tanzania

dc.subject

Implementation Science

dc.title

Improving acute myocardial infarction care in northern Tanzania: barrier identification and implementation strategy mapping.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Hertz, Julian T|0000-0002-7396-4789

duke.contributor.orcid

Coaxum, Lauren|0009-0000-1630-1009

duke.contributor.orcid

Thielman, Nathan M|0000-0001-8152-2879

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

duke.contributor.orcid

Bettger, Janet P|0000-0001-9708-8413

pubs.begin-page

393

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Infectious Diseases

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Emergency Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

24

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Improving acute myocardial infarction care in northern Tanzania barrier identification and implementation strategy mapping.pdf
Size:
1.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format