Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis.

dc.contributor.author

Wadhwa, Harsh

dc.contributor.author

Sharma, Jigyasa

dc.contributor.author

Varshneya, Kunal

dc.contributor.author

Fatemi, Parastou

dc.contributor.author

Nathan, Jay

dc.contributor.author

Medress, Zachary A

dc.contributor.author

Stienen, Martin N

dc.contributor.author

Ratliff, John K

dc.contributor.author

Veeravagu, Anand

dc.date.accessioned

2025-05-23T19:26:59Z

dc.date.available

2025-05-23T19:26:59Z

dc.date.issued

2021-08

dc.description.abstract

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is effective for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). However, the data surrounding multilevel CSM have remained controversial. One alternative is laminoplasty, although evidence comparing these strategies has remained sparse. In the present report, we retrospectively reviewed the readmission and reoperation rates for patients who had undergone ACDF or laminoplasty for multilevel CSM from a national longitudinal administrative claims database.

Methods

We queried the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database to identify patients who had undergone ACDF or laminoplasty for multilevel CSM from 2007 to 2016. The patients were stratified by operation type. Patients aged <18 years, patients with a history of tumor or trauma, and patients who had undergone anteroposterior approach were excluded from the present study.

Results

A total of 5445 patients were included, of whom 1521 had undergone laminoplasty. A matched cohort who had undergone ACDF was identified. The overall 90-day postoperative complication rate was greater in the laminoplasty cohort (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.86; P < 0.0001). The mean length of stay and 90-day readmission rates were greater in the laminoplasty cohort. The hospital and total payments of the index hospitalization were greater in the ACDF cohort, as were the total payments for ≤2 years after the index hospitalization.

Conclusions

In the present administrative claims database study, no difference was found in the reoperation rate between ACDF and laminoplasty. ACDF resulted in fewer complications and readmissions compared with laminoplasty but was associated with greater costs. Additional prospective research is required to investigate the factors driving the higher costs of ACDF in this population and the long-term clinical outcomes.
dc.identifier

S1878-8750(21)00895-0

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8750

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8769

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32422

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

World neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.wneu.2021.06.064

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Cervical Vertebrae

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Spinal Neoplasms

dc.subject

Spinal Cord Diseases

dc.subject

Spinal Injuries

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Length of Stay

dc.subject

Patient Readmission

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Diskectomy

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Cohort Studies

dc.subject

Databases, Factual

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Costs and Cost Analysis

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Spondylosis

dc.subject

Laminoplasty

dc.title

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A National Administrative Database Analysis.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Fatemi, Parastou|0000-0001-8188-8440

pubs.begin-page

e738

pubs.end-page

e744

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

152

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1878875021008950-main.pdf
Size:
278.81 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format