Savanna elephant numbers are only a quarter of their expected values.

dc.contributor.author

Robson, Ashley S

dc.contributor.author

Trimble, Morgan J

dc.contributor.author

Purdon, Andrew

dc.contributor.author

Young-Overton, Kim D

dc.contributor.author

Pimm, Stuart L

dc.contributor.author

van Aarde, Rudi J

dc.date.accessioned

2021-08-02T18:26:39Z

dc.date.available

2021-08-02T18:26:39Z

dc.date.issued

2017-01

dc.date.updated

2021-08-02T18:26:35Z

dc.description.abstract

Savannas once constituted the range of many species that human encroachment has now reduced to a fraction of their former distribution. Many survive only in protected areas. Poaching reduces the savanna elephant, even where protected, likely to the detriment of savanna ecosystems. While resources go into estimating elephant populations, an ecological benchmark by which to assess counts is lacking. Knowing how many elephants there are and how many poachers kill is important, but on their own, such data lack context. We collated savanna elephant count data from 73 protected areas across the continent estimated to hold ~50% of Africa's elephants and extracted densities from 18 broadly stable population time series. We modeled these densities using primary productivity, water availability, and an index of poaching as predictors. We then used the model to predict stable densities given current conditions and poaching for all 73 populations. Next, to generate ecological benchmarks, we predicted such densities for a scenario of zero poaching. Where historical data are available, they corroborate or exceed benchmarks. According to recent counts, collectively, the 73 savanna elephant populations are at 75% of the size predicted based on current conditions and poaching levels. However, populations are at <25% of ecological benchmarks given a scenario of zero poaching (~967,000)-a total deficit of ~730,000 elephants. Populations in 30% of the 73 protected areas were <5% of their benchmarks, and the median current density as a percentage of ecological benchmark across protected areas was just 13%. The ecological context provided by these benchmark values, in conjunction with ongoing census projects, allow efficient targeting of conservation efforts.

dc.identifier

PONE-D-16-34536

dc.identifier.issn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.issn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23538

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

dc.relation.ispartof

PloS one

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1371/journal.pone.0175942

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Elephants

dc.subject

Ecology

dc.subject

Conservation of Natural Resources

dc.subject

Ecosystem

dc.subject

Population Dynamics

dc.subject

Grassland

dc.title

Savanna elephant numbers are only a quarter of their expected values.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Pimm, Stuart L|0000-0003-4206-2456

pubs.begin-page

e0175942

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Savanna elephant numbers are only a quarter of their expected values.pdf
Size:
4.78 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format