Biomarkers and proteomic analysis of osteoarthritis.

dc.contributor.author

Hsueh, Ming-Feng

dc.contributor.author

Önnerfjord, Patrik

dc.contributor.author

Kraus, Virginia Byers

dc.coverage.spatial

Netherlands

dc.date.accessioned

2015-11-10T15:16:26Z

dc.date.accessioned

2015-11-10T15:19:52Z

dc.date.issued

2014-10

dc.description.abstract

Our friend and colleague, Dr. Dick Heinegård, contributed greatly to the understanding of joint tissue biochemistry, the discovery and validation of arthritis-related biomarkers and the establishment of methodology for proteomic studies in osteoarthritis (OA). To date, discovery of OA-related biomarkers has focused on cartilage, synovial fluid and serum. Methods, such as affinity depletion and hyaluronidase treatment have facilitated proteomics discovery research from these sources. Osteoarthritis usually involves multiple joints; this characteristic makes it easier to detect OA with a systemic biomarker but makes it hard to delineate abnormalities of individual affected joints. Although the abundance of cartilage proteins in urine may generally be lower than other tissue/sample sources, the protein composition of urine is much less complex and its collection is non-invasive thereby facilitating the development of patient friendly biomarkers. To date however, relatively few proteomics studies have been conducted in OA urine. Proteomics strategies have identified many proteins that may relate to pathological mechanisms of OA. Further targeted approaches to validate the role of these proteins in OA are needed. Herein we summarize recent proteomic studies related to joint tissues and the cohorts used; a clear understanding of the cohorts is important for this work as we expect that the decisive discoveries of OA-related biomarkers rely on comprehensive phenotyping of healthy non-OA and OA subjects. Besides the common phenotyping criteria that include, gender, age, and body mass index (BMI), it is essential to collect data on symptoms and signs of OA outside the index joints and to bolster this with objective imaging data whenever possible to gain the most precise appreciation of the total burden of disease. Proteomic studies on systemic biospecimens, such as serum and urine, rely on comprehensive phenotyping data to unravel the true meaning of the proteomic results.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179675

dc.identifier

S0945-053X(14)00165-6

dc.identifier.eissn

1569-1802

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10835

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier

dc.relation.ispartof

Matrix Biol

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.matbio.2014.08.012

dc.relation.replaces

http://hdl.handle.net/10161/10834

dc.relation.replaces

10161/10834

dc.subject

Biomarker

dc.subject

Cartilage explants

dc.subject

Cartilage tissue

dc.subject

Chondrocytes

dc.subject

Mass spectrometry

dc.subject

Osteoarthritis

dc.subject

Proteomics

dc.subject

Serum

dc.subject

Synovial fluid

dc.subject

Urine

dc.subject

Animals

dc.subject

Biomarkers

dc.subject

Cartilage, Articular

dc.subject

Chondrocytes

dc.subject

Extracellular Matrix

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Osteoarthritis

dc.subject

Proteome

dc.subject

Proteomics

dc.title

Biomarkers and proteomic analysis of osteoarthritis.

dc.type

Other article

duke.contributor.orcid

Hsueh, Ming-Feng|0000-0002-2334-1604

duke.contributor.orcid

Kraus, Virginia Byers|0000-0001-8173-8258

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179675

pubs.begin-page

56

pubs.end-page

66

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Molecular Physiology Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Rheumatology and Immunology

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

39

Files