Population Segmentation Based on Healthcare Needs: Validation of a Brief Clinician-Administered Tool.

dc.contributor.author

Chong, Jia Loon

dc.contributor.author

Matchar, David Bruce

dc.contributor.author

Tan, Yuyang

dc.contributor.author

Sri Kumaran, Shalini

dc.contributor.author

Gandhi, Mihir

dc.contributor.author

Ong, Marcus Eng Hock

dc.contributor.author

Wong, Kok Seng

dc.date.accessioned

2021-05-05T05:39:52Z

dc.date.available

2021-05-05T05:39:52Z

dc.date.issued

2021-01

dc.date.updated

2021-05-05T05:39:47Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

As populations age with increasingly complex chronic conditions, segmenting populations into clinically meaningful categories of healthcare and related service needs can provide healthcare planners with crucial information to optimally meet needs. However, while conventional approaches typically involve electronic medical records (EMRs), such records do not always capture information reliably or accurately.

Objective

We describe the inter-rater reliability and predictive validity of a clinician-administered tool, the Simple Segmentation Tool (SST) for categorizing older individuals into one of six Global Impression (GI) segments and eight complicating factors (CFs) indicative of healthcare and related social needs.

Design

Observational study ( ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02663037).

Participants

Patients aged 55 years and above.

Main measures

Emergency department (ED) subjects (between May and June 2016) had baseline SST assessment by two physicians and a nurse concurrently seeing the same individual. General medical (GM) ward subjects (February 2017) had a SST assessment by their principal physician. Adverse events (ED visits, hospitalizations, and mortality over 90 days from baseline) were determined by a blinded reviewer. Inter-rater reliability was measured using Cohen's kappa. Predictive validity was evaluated using Cox hazard ratios based on time to first adverse event.

Key results

Cohen's kappa between physician-physician, service physician-nurse, and physician-nurse pairs for GI were 0.60, 0.71, and 0.68, respectively. Cox analyses demonstrated significant predictive validity of GI and CFs for adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

With modest training, clinicians can complete a brief instrument to segment their patient into clinically meaningful categories of healthcare and related service needs. This approach can complement and overcome current limitations of EMR-based instruments, particularly with respect to whole-patient care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02663037.
dc.identifier

10.1007/s11606-020-05962-4

dc.identifier.issn

0884-8734

dc.identifier.issn

1525-1497

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22763

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of general internal medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s11606-020-05962-4

dc.subject

aging

dc.subject

health services research

dc.subject

psychometrics

dc.title

Population Segmentation Based on Healthcare Needs: Validation of a Brief Clinician-Administered Tool.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Matchar, David Bruce|0000-0003-3020-2108

pubs.begin-page

9

pubs.end-page

16

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

36

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Population Segmentation Based on Healthcare Needs Validation of a Brief Clinician-Administered Tool..pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format