Factors Related to Biologic Adherence and Outcomes Among Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Patients.

dc.contributor.author

Osazuwa-Peters, Oyomoare L

dc.contributor.author

Greiner, Melissa A

dc.contributor.author

Oberle, Amber

dc.contributor.author

Oakes, Megan

dc.contributor.author

Thomas, Sheila M

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-02T19:53:19Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-02T19:53:19Z

dc.date.issued

2022-09

dc.description.abstract

Background

Adherence barriers to asthma biologics may not be uniform across administration settings for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Objective

To examine differences in asthma biologic adherence and associated factors, as well as association with a 1-year all-cause emergency department (ED) visit, across administration settings.

Methods

A retrospective study of biologic naïve moderate-to-severe asthma patients with initial biologic therapy between January 1, 2016, and April 30, 2020, in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart was performed. Three administration settings were identified: Clinic-only (outpatient office/infusion center), Home (self-administration), and Hybrid setting (mixture of clinic and self-administration). Asthma biologic adherence was the proportion of observed over expected biologic dose administrations received within 6 months from initial therapy. Factors associated with adherence were identified by administration setting, using Poisson regression analyses. A relationship between a 1-year all-cause ED visit and adherence was assessed for each administration setting using Cox regression analyses.

Results

The study cohort was 3932 patients. Biologics adherence was 0.75 [0.5, 1] in Clinic setting, the most common administration setting, and 0.83 [0.5, 1] in both Home and Hybrid settings. Specialist access was consistently associated with better biologic adherence, whereas Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, lower education, Medicare only insurance, and higher patient out-of-pocket cost were associated with worse biologic adherence in some settings. In the Hybrid setting, hazard for a 1-year all-cause ED visit decreased with biologic adherence.

Conclusions

Asthma biologic adherence varied by administration setting. Efforts to improve asthma biologic adherence should consider promoting self-administration when beneficial, improving prior specialist access, and targeting patients with higher risk of suboptimal adherence particularly Black and Hispanic patients.
dc.identifier

S2213-2198(22)00532-3

dc.identifier.issn

2213-2198

dc.identifier.issn

2213-2201

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29620

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.022

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Asthma

dc.subject

Biological Products

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Cohort Studies

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Medicare

dc.subject

United States

dc.subject

Medication Adherence

dc.title

Factors Related to Biologic Adherence and Outcomes Among Moderate-to-Severe Asthma Patients.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.begin-page

2355

pubs.end-page

2366

pubs.issue

9

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S22132198220053231.2.24_1.2.24_6.pdf
Size:
496.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format