International Comparison of Poststroke Resource Use: A Longitudinal Analysis in Europe.

dc.contributor.author

Matchar, David B

dc.contributor.author

Bilger, Marcel

dc.contributor.author

Do, Young K

dc.contributor.author

Eom, Kirsten

dc.date.accessioned

2021-05-05T08:38:18Z

dc.date.available

2021-05-05T08:38:18Z

dc.date.issued

2015-10

dc.date.updated

2021-05-05T08:38:18Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Long-term costs often represent a large proportion of the total costs induced by stroke, but data on long-term poststroke resource use are sparse, especially regarding the trajectory of costs by severity. We used a multinational longitudinal survey to estimate patterns of poststroke resource use by degree of functional disability and to compare resource use between regions.

Methods

The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) is a multinational database of adults 50 years and older, which includes demographic information about respondents, age when stroke first occurred, current activity of daily living (ADL) limitations, and health care resource use in the year before interview. We modeled resource use with a 2-part regression for number of hospital days, home nursing hours, and paid and unpaid home caregiving hours.

Results

After accounting for time since stroke, number of strokes and comorbidities, age, gender, and European regions, we found that poststroke resource use was strongly associated with ADL limitations. The duration since the stroke event was significantly associated only with inpatient care, and informal help showed significant regional heterogeneity across all ADL limitation levels.

Conclusions

Poststroke physical deficits appear to be a strong driver of long-term resource utilization; treatments that decrease such deficits offer substantial potential for downline cost savings. Analyzing internationally comparable panel data, such as SHARE, provide valuable insight into long-term cost of stroke. More comprehensive international comparisons will require registries with follow-up, particularly for informal and formal home-based care.
dc.identifier

S1052-3057(15)00345-6

dc.identifier.issn

1052-3057

dc.identifier.issn

1532-8511

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22824

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.06.020

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Hospitalization

dc.subject

Regression Analysis

dc.subject

Longitudinal Studies

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Aged, 80 and over

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Health Care Costs

dc.subject

Health Resources

dc.subject

Europe

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Stroke

dc.subject

Outcome Assessment, Health Care

dc.title

International Comparison of Poststroke Resource Use: A Longitudinal Analysis in Europe.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Matchar, David B|0000-0003-3020-2108

pubs.begin-page

2256

pubs.end-page

2262

pubs.issue

10

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

24

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
International Comparison of Poststroke Resource Use A Longitudinal Analysis in Europe.pdf
Size:
212.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format