Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map.

dc.contributor.author

Goldstein, Karen M

dc.contributor.author

Zullig, Leah L

dc.contributor.author

Dedert, Eric A

dc.contributor.author

Alishahi Tabriz, Amir

dc.contributor.author

Brearly, Timothy W

dc.contributor.author

Raitz, Giselle

dc.contributor.author

Sata, Suchita Shah

dc.contributor.author

Whited, John D

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Gordon, Adelaide M

dc.contributor.author

Nagi, Avishek

dc.contributor.author

Williams, John W

dc.contributor.author

Gierisch, Jennifer M

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-26T00:34:58Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-26T00:34:58Z

dc.date.issued

2018-12

dc.description.abstract

Background

Telehealth employs technology to connect patients to the right healthcare resources at the right time. Women are high utilizers of healthcare with gender-specific health issues that may benefit from the convenience and personalization of telehealth. Thus, we produced an evidence map describing the quantity, distribution, and characteristics of evidence assessing the effectiveness of telehealth services designed for women.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE® (via PubMed®) and Embase® from inception through March 20, 2018. We screened systematic reviews (SRs), randomized trials, and quasi-experimental studies using predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified for data abstraction. To assess emerging trends, we also conducted a targeted search of ClinicalTrials.gov .

Results

Two hundred thirty-four primary studies and three SRs were eligible for abstraction. We grouped studies into focused areas of research: maternal health (n = 96), prevention (n = 46), disease management (n = 63), family planning (n = 9), high-risk breast cancer assessment (n = 10), intimate partner violence (n = 7), and mental health (n = 3). Most interventions focused on phone as the primary telehealth modality and featured healthcare team-to-patient communication and were limited in duration (e.g., < 12 weeks). Few interventions were conducted with older women (≥ 60 years) or in racially/ethnically diverse populations. There are few SRs in this area and limited evidence regarding newer telehealth modalities such as mobile-based applications or short message service/texting. Targeted search of clinical.trials.gov yielded 73 ongoing studies that show a shift in the use of non-telephone modalities.

Discussion

Our systematic evidence map highlights gaps in the existing literature, such as a lack of studies in key women's health areas (intimate partner violence, mental health), and a dearth of relevant SRs. With few existing SRs in this literature, there is an opportunity for examining effects, efficiency, and acceptability across studies to inform efforts at implementing telehealth for women.
dc.identifier

10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8

dc.identifier.issn

0884-8734

dc.identifier.issn

1525-1497

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29875

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of general internal medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1007/s11606-018-4655-8

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Telemedicine

dc.subject

Women's Health

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

dc.subject

Evidence-Based Practice

dc.subject

Systematic Reviews as Topic

dc.title

Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women: an Evidence Map.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Goldstein, Karen M|0000-0003-4419-5869

duke.contributor.orcid

Zullig, Leah L|0000-0002-6638-409X

duke.contributor.orcid

Dedert, Eric A|0000-0003-1301-7058

duke.contributor.orcid

Sata, Suchita Shah|0000-0002-9773-6174

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

duke.contributor.orcid

Williams, John W|0000-0002-5267-5558

pubs.begin-page

2191

pubs.end-page

2200

pubs.issue

12

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Faculty

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

33

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Telehealth Interventions Designed for Women an Evidence Map.pdf
Size:
937.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format