Caring for Each Other: A Resident-Led Peer Debriefing Skills Workshop.
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Grace S | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dizon, Samantha E | |
| dc.contributor.author | Feeney, Colby D | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yu-Lin Amy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jordan, Megan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Galanos, Anthony N | |
| dc.contributor.author | Trinh, Jane V | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-26T17:01:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-26T17:01:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-04 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2023-05-26T17:01:27Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | BackgroundInadequate time and space to process critical incidents contribute to burnout. Residents do not regularly participate in emotional debriefs. An institutional needs assessment revealed only 11% of surveyed pediatrics and combined medicine-pediatrics residents had participated in a debrief.ObjectiveThe primary objective was to increase resident comfort in participation in peer debriefs after critical incidents from 30% to 50% with implementation of a resident-led peer debriefing skills workshop. Secondary objectives included increasing resident likelihood of leading debriefs and comfort in identifying symptoms of emotional distress.MethodsInternal medicine, pediatrics, and medicine-pediatrics residents were surveyed for baseline participation in debriefs and comfort in leading peer debriefs. Two senior residents became trained debrief facilitators and led a 50-minute peer debriefing skills workshop for co-residents. Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed participant comfort in and likelihood of leading peer debriefs. Surveys distributed 6 months post-workshop assessed resident debrief participation. We implemented the Model for Improvement from 2019 to 2022.ResultsForty-six (77%) and 44 (73%) of the 60 participants completed the pre- and post-workshop surveys. Post-workshop, residents' reported comfort in leading debriefs increased from 30% to 91%. The likelihood of leading a debrief increased from 51% to 91%. Ninety-five percent (42 of 44) agreed that formal training in debriefing is beneficial. Almost 50% (24 of 52) of surveyed residents preferred to debrief with a peer. Six months post-workshop, 22% (15 of 68) of surveyed residents had led a peer debrief.ConclusionsMany residents prefer to debrief with a peer after critical incidents that cause emotional distress. Resident-led workshops can improve resident comfort in peer debriefing. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1949-8349 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1949-8357 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ||
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Journal of Graduate Medical Education | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of graduate medical education | |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.4300/jgme-d-22-00513.1 | |
| dc.subject | Humans | |
| dc.subject | Peer Group | |
| dc.subject | Internal Medicine | |
| dc.subject | Internship and Residency | |
| dc.subject | Clinical Competence | |
| dc.subject | Child | |
| dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| dc.title | Caring for Each Other: A Resident-Led Peer Debriefing Skills Workshop. | |
| dc.type | Journal article | |
| pubs.begin-page | 248 | |
| pubs.end-page | 251 | |
| pubs.issue | 2 | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
| pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Medicine | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Pediatrics | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Medicine, General Internal Medicine | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology | |
| pubs.organisational-group | Pediatrics, Medicine/Pediatrics | |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | |
| pubs.volume | 15 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Peer debrief workshop i1949-8357-15-2-248.pdf
- Size:
- 456.09 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format