Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

dc.contributor.author

Babu, Ranjith

dc.contributor.author

Park, Jong G

dc.contributor.author

Mehta, Ankit I

dc.contributor.author

Shan, Tony

dc.contributor.author

Grossi, Peter M

dc.contributor.author

Brown, Christopher R

dc.contributor.author

Richardson, William J

dc.contributor.author

Isaacs, Robert E

dc.contributor.author

Bagley, Carlos A

dc.contributor.author

Kuchibhatla, Maragatha

dc.contributor.author

Gottfried, Oren N

dc.date.accessioned

2024-08-15T13:18:54Z

dc.date.available

2024-08-15T13:18:54Z

dc.date.issued

2012-11

dc.description.abstract

Background

Superior-level facet joint violation by pedicle screws may result in increased stress to the level above the instrumentation and may contribute to adjacent segment disease. Previous studies have evaluated facet joint violations in open or percutaneous screw cases, but there are no reports describing a direct institutional comparison.

Objective

To compare the incidence of superior-level facet violation for open vs percutaneous pedicle screws and to evaluate patient and surgical factors that affect this outcome.

Methods

We reviewed 279 consecutive patients who underwent an index instrumented lumbar fusion from 2007 to 2011 for degenerative spine disease with stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis. We used a computed tomography grading system that represents progressively increasing grades of facet joint violation. Patient and surgical factors were evaluated to determine their impact on facet violation.

Results

Our cohort consisted of 126 open and 153 percutaneous cases. Percutaneous procedures had a higher overall violation grade (P = .02) and a greater incidence of high-grade violations (P = .006) compared with open procedures. Bivariate analysis showed significantly greater violations in percutaneous cases for age < 65 years, obesity, pedicle screws at L4, and 1- and 2-level surgeries. Multivariate analysis showed the percutaneous approach and depth of the spine to be independent risk factors for high-grade violations.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates greater facet violations for percutaneously placed pedicle screws compared with open screws.
dc.identifier.issn

0148-396X

dc.identifier.issn

1524-4040

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31396

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1227/neu.0b013e31826a88c8

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Lumbar Vertebrae

dc.subject

Zygapophyseal Joint

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Postoperative Complications

dc.subject

Tomography, X-Ray Computed

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Logistic Models

dc.subject

Cohort Studies

dc.subject

Bone Screws

dc.subject

Internal Fixators

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.title

Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Richardson, William J|0000-0001-9608-199X|0000-0002-8750-7263|0009-0003-7526-7797

pubs.begin-page

962

pubs.end-page

970

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Faculty

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Division of Biostatistics

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

71

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison_of_Superior-Level_F.pdf
Size:
449.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format