The impact of geologic variability on capacity and cost estimates for storing CO 2 in deep-saline aquifers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2012-09-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

249
views
315
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

While numerous studies find that deep-saline sandstone aquifers in the United States could store many decades worth of the nation's current annual CO 2 emissions, the likely cost of this storage (i.e. the cost of storage only and not capture and transport costs) has been harder to constrain. We use publicly available data of key reservoir properties to produce geo-referenced rasters of estimated storage capacity and cost for regions within 15 deep-saline sandstone aquifers in the United States. The rasters reveal the reservoir quality of these aquifers to be so variable that the cost estimates for storage span three orders of magnitude and average>$100/tonne CO 2. However, when the cost and corresponding capacity estimates in the rasters are assembled into a marginal abatement cost curve (MACC), we find that ~75% of the estimated storage capacity could be available for<$2/tonne. Furthermore, ~80% of the total estimated storage capacity in the rasters is concentrated within just two of the aquifers-the Frio Formation along the Texas Gulf Coast, and the Mt. Simon Formation in the Michigan Basin, which together make up only ~20% of the areas analyzed. While our assessment is not comprehensive, the results suggest there should be an abundance of low-cost storage for CO 2 in deep-saline aquifers, but a majority of this storage is likely to be concentrated within specific regions of a smaller number of these aquifers. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.015

Publication Info

Eccles, JK, L Pratson, RG Newell and RB Jackson (2012). The impact of geologic variability on capacity and cost estimates for storing CO 2 in deep-saline aquifers. Energy Economics, 34(5). pp. 1569–1579. 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.015 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6609.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.