Silencing Agency in Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by Essentializing a Neoliberal ‘Monster’ Into Being: A Response to Fletcher & Büscher's ‘PES Conceit’

dc.contributor.author	Van Hecken, G
dc.contributor.author	Kolinjivadi, V
dc.contributor.author	Windey, C
dc.contributor.author	McElwee, P
dc.contributor.author	Shapiro-Garza, E
dc.contributor.author	Huybrechs, F
dc.contributor.author	Bastiaensen, J
dc.date.accessioned	2017-11-17T17:26:57Z
dc.date.available	2017-11-17T17:26:57Z
dc.date.issued	2017-11
dc.identifier.issn	0921-8009
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15756
dc.publisher	Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartof	Ecological Economics
dc.relation.isversionof	10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.10.023
dc.title	Silencing Agency in Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) by Essentializing a Neoliberal ‘Monster’ Into Being: A Response to Fletcher & Büscher's ‘PES Conceit’
dc.type	Journal article
pubs.organisational-group	Duke
pubs.organisational-group	Duke Science & Society
pubs.organisational-group	Environmental Sciences and Policy
pubs.organisational-group	Initiatives
pubs.organisational-group	Institutes and Provost's Academic Units
pubs.organisational-group	Nicholas School of the Environment
pubs.publication-status	Published

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1