Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women.

dc.contributor.author

Jelovsek, J Eric

dc.contributor.author

Hill, Audra Jolyn

dc.contributor.author

Chagin, Kevin M

dc.contributor.author

Kattan, Michael W

dc.contributor.author

Barber, Matthew D

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2017-08-01T13:47:51Z

dc.date.available

2017-08-01T13:47:51Z

dc.date.issued

2016-02

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate models that predict a patient's risk of developing stress and urgency urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after sling surgery. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of four randomized trials. Twenty-five candidate predictors (patient characteristics and urodynamic variables) were identified from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings (N=597). Multiple logistic models were fit to predict four different outcomes: 1) bothersome stress urinary incontinence; 2) a positive stress test; 3) bothersome urgency urinary incontinence; and 4) any adverse event up to 12 months after sling surgery. Model discrimination was measured using a concordance index. Each model's concordance index was internally validated using 1,000 bootstrap samples and calibration curves were plotted. Final models were externally validated on a separate data set (n=902) from a combination of three different multicenter randomized trials. RESULTS: Four best models discriminated on internal validation between women with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.728, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.683-0.773), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.712, 95% CI 0.669-0.758), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.722, 95% CI 0.680-0.764), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.640, 95% CI 0.595-0.681) after sling surgery. Each model's concordance index was reduced as expected when important variables were removed for external validation, but model discrimination remained stable with bothersome stress urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.548), a positive stress test (concordance index 0.656), bothersome urgency urinary incontinence (concordance index 0.621), and any adverse event (concordance index 0.567). Predicted probabilities are closest to actual probabilities when predictions are less than 50%. CONCLUSION: Four best and modified models discriminate between women who will and will not develop urinary incontinence and adverse events 12 months after midurethral sling surgery 64-73% and 55-66% of the time, respectively.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942362

dc.identifier

00006250-201602000-00022

dc.identifier.eissn

1873-233X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15135

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Obstet Gynecol

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/AOG.0000000000001269

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Follow-Up Studies

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Incidence

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Ohio

dc.subject

Predictive Value of Tests

dc.subject

Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

dc.subject

Reproducibility of Results

dc.subject

Risk Assessment

dc.subject

Suburethral Slings

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

dc.subject

Urinary Incontinence, Urge

dc.subject

Urodynamics

dc.title

Predicting Risk of Urinary Incontinence and Adverse Events After Midurethral Sling Surgery in Women.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Jelovsek, J Eric|0000-0002-7196-817X

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26942362

pubs.begin-page

330

pubs.end-page

340

pubs.issue

2

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urogynecology

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

127

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OBG Models for SUI and AEs planning MUS.pdf
Size:
770.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version