Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review.

dc.contributor.author

Horn, Maggie E

dc.contributor.author

Reinke, Emily K

dc.contributor.author

Couce, Logan J

dc.contributor.author

Reeve, Bryce B

dc.contributor.author

Ledbetter, Leila

dc.contributor.author

George, Steven Z

dc.date.accessioned

2020-12-01T21:10:00Z

dc.date.available

2020-12-01T21:10:00Z

dc.date.issued

2020-11-23

dc.date.updated

2020-12-01T21:09:59Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemⓇ (PROMISⓇ) is a dynamic system of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. There has been a recent increase in the use of PROMIS measures, yet little has been written about the reporting of these measures in the field of orthopedics. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to determine the uptake of PROMIS measures across orthopedics and to identify the type of PROMIS measures and domains that are most commonly used in orthopedic research and practice. METHODS:We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using keywords and database-specific subject headings to capture orthopedic studies reporting PROMIS measures through November 2018. Our inclusion criteria were use of PROMIS measures as an outcome or used to describe a population of patients in an orthopedic setting in patients ≥ 18 years of age. We excluded non-quantitative studies, reviews, and case reports. RESULTS:Our final search yielded 88 studies published from 2013 through 2018, with 57% (50 studies) published in 2018 alone. By body region, 28% (25 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, hand), 36% (32 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the lower extremity (hip, knee, ankle, foot), 19% (17 studies) reported PROMIS measures in the spine, 10% (9 studies) reported PROMIS measures in trauma patients, and 6% (5 studies) reported PROMIS measures in general orthopedic patients. The majority of studies reported between one and three PROMIS domains (82%, 73 studies). The PROMIS Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) approach was most commonly used (81%, 72 studies). The most frequently reported PROMIS domains were physical function (81%, 71 studies) and pain interference (61%, 54 studies). CONCLUSION:Our review found an increase in the reporting of PROMIS measures over the recent years. Utilization of PROMIS measures in orthopedic populations is clinically appropriate and can facilitate communication of outcomes across different provider types and with reduced respondent burden. REGISTRATION:The protocol for this systematic review was designed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and is registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018088260).

dc.identifier

10.1186/s13018-020-02068-9

dc.identifier.issn

1749-799X

dc.identifier.issn

1749-799X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21789

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1186/s13018-020-02068-9

dc.subject

Orthopedics

dc.subject

PROMIS

dc.subject

Pain

dc.subject

Patient-reported outcome measures

dc.subject

Physical function

dc.title

Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Horn, Maggie E|0000-0002-3963-7389

duke.contributor.orcid

Reinke, Emily K|0000-0001-7629-8067

duke.contributor.orcid

Reeve, Bryce B|0000-0002-6709-8714

duke.contributor.orcid

Ledbetter, Leila|0000-0002-5206-8002

duke.contributor.orcid

George, Steven Z|0000-0003-4988-9421

pubs.begin-page

553

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics, Physical Therapy

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

15

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s13018-020-02068-9.pdf
Size:
844.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format