Novel application of approaches to predicting medication adherence using medical claims data.
Date
2019-12
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
Objective
To compare predictive analytic approaches to characterize medication nonadherence and determine under which circumstances each method may be best applied.Data sources/study setting
Medicare Parts A, B, and D claims from 2007 to 2013.Study design
We evaluated three statistical techniques to predict statin adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC ≥ 80 percent]) in the year following discharge: standard logistic regression with backward selection of covariates, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and random forest. We used the C-index to assess model discrimination and decile plots comparing predicted values to observed event rates to evaluate model performance.Data extraction
We identified 11 969 beneficiaries with an acute myocardial infarction (MI)-related admission from 2007 to 2012, who filled a statin prescription at, or shortly after, discharge.Principal findings
In all models, prior statin use was the most important predictor of future adherence (OR = 3.65, 95% CI: 3.34-3.98; OR = 3.55). Although the LASSO regression model selected nearly 90 percent of all candidate predictors, all three analytic approaches had moderate discrimination (C-index ranging from 0.664 to 0.673).Conclusions
Although none of the models emerged as clearly superior, predictive analytics could proactively determine which patients are at risk of nonadherence, thus allowing for timely engagement in adherence-improving interventions.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Zullig, Leah L, Shelley A Jazowski, Tracy Y Wang, Anne Hellkamp, Daniel Wojdyla, Laine Thomas, Lisa Egbuonu-Davis, Anne Beal, et al. (2019). Novel application of approaches to predicting medication adherence using medical claims data. Health services research, 54(6). pp. 1255–1262. 10.1111/1475-6773.13200 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28703.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.