Freezing behaviour facilitates bioelectric crypsis in cuttlefish faced with predation risk.
Abstract
Cephalopods, and in particular the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis, are common models
for studies of camouflage and predator avoidance behaviour. Preventing detection by
predators is especially important to this group of animals, most of which are soft-bodied,
lack physical defences, and are subject to both visually and non-visually mediated
detection. Here, we report a novel cryptic mechanism in S. officinalis in which bioelectric
cues are reduced via a behavioural freeze response to a predator stimulus. The reduction
of bioelectric fields created by the freeze-simulating stimulus resulted in a possible
decrease in shark predation risk by reducing detectability. The freeze response may
also facilitate other non-visual cryptic mechanisms to lower predation risk from a
wide range of predator types.
Type
Journal articleSubject
biophysical ecologycephalopod
crypsis
elasmobranch
electroreception
sensory ecology
Adaptation, Physiological
Animals
Behavior, Animal
Cues
Electric Stimulation
Electrophysiological Phenomena
Predatory Behavior
Sepia
Sharks
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11190Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1098/rspb.2015.1886Publication Info
Bedore, Christine N; Kajiura, Stephen M; & Johnsen, Sönke (2015). Freezing behaviour facilitates bioelectric crypsis in cuttlefish faced with predation
risk. Proc Biol Sci, 282(1820). pp. 20151886. 10.1098/rspb.2015.1886. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/11190.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Sonke Johnsen
Professor of Biology

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info