dc.contributor.author |
Gabr, Mostafa A |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Touko, Elisabeth |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Yadav, Amol P |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Karikari, Isaac |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Goodwin, C Rory |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Groff, Michael W |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ramirez, Luis |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-01-25T20:39:12Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-01-25T20:39:12Z |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2192-5682 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2192-5690 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19776 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design:</jats:title><jats:p> Systematic review and meta-analysis.
</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective:</jats:title><jats:p> To perform
a systematic review of clinical outcomes between stand-alone anchored spacers and
traditional cages with plate fixation for dysphagia and pseudoarthrosis using data
from clinical trials. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>
Our search protocol was added to PROSPERO register and systematic review using PRISMA
method was performed. Then, we systematically searched for studies addressing stand-alone
anchored spacers in patients who underwent ACDF. Mean Neck Disability Index (NDI),
dysphagia incidence % (Dinc%), and Swallowing–Quality of Life (SQOL) scores during
preoperative, immediate postoperative and last follow-up visits were extracted. Chi-square
and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were used for statistical comparisons ( P ≤
.05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The
initial search generated 506 articles in CENTRAL and 40 articles in MEDLINE. Finally,
14 articles were included. Total number of patients was 1173 (583 anchored stand-alone
and 590 plate). Dinc% scores were statistically significantly lower in the stand-alone
anchored spacer compared to the plate-screw construct ( P ≤ .05). ANOVA showed no
statistically significant difference in the comparisons of SQOL. On the other hand,
NDI scores were statistically significantly lower in baseline of stand-alone anchored
spacer and the plate-screw construct compared with both immediate postoperative and
last follow-up visits ( P ≤ .05). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p>
Our study results revealed that the stand-alone anchored spacers were associated with
less dysphagia in the immediate and last follow-up. </jats:p></jats:sec>
|
|
dc.language |
en |
|
dc.publisher |
SAGE Publications |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Global Spine Journal |
|
dc.relation.isversionof |
10.1177/2192568219895266 |
|
dc.title |
Improved Dysphagia Outcomes in Anchored Spacers Versus Plate-Screw Systems in Anterior
Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review
|
|
dc.type |
Journal article |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Gabr, Mostafa A|0501606 |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Yadav, Amol P|0480720 |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Karikari, Isaac|0293374 |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Goodwin, C Rory|0791318 |
|
duke.contributor.id |
Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0791319 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2020-01-25T20:39:11Z |
|
pubs.begin-page |
219256821989526 |
|
pubs.end-page |
219256821989526 |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Staff |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Neurosurgery |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Clinical Science Departments |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
School of Medicine |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Duke Cancer Institute |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Institutes and Centers |
|
pubs.organisational-group |
Radiation Oncology |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published online |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Gabr, Mostafa A|0000-0003-2058-2098 |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Yadav, Amol P|0000-0002-4913-8006 |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Goodwin, C Rory|0000-0002-6540-2751 |
|
duke.contributor.orcid |
Abd-El-Barr, Muhammad M|0000-0001-7151-2861 |
|