ALERT: This system is being upgraded on Tuesday December 12. It will not be available
for use for several hours that day while the upgrade is in progress. Deposits to DukeSpace
will be disabled on Monday December 11, so no new items are to be added to the repository
while the upgrade is in progress. Everything should be back to normal by the end of
day, December 12.
Safety, efficacy, and dosing of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumented fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Considerable attention has focused on concerns of increased complications
with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) use for anterior cervical
fusion, but few reports have assessed its use for posterior cervical fusions.<h4>Objective</h4>To
assess the safety, efficacy, and dosing of rhBMP-2 as an adjunct for instrumented
posterior cervical arthrodesis.<h4>Methods</h4>All patients treated by the senior
author with posterior cervical or cervicothoracic instrumented fusion using rhBMP-2
from 2003 to 2008 with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up were included. Diagnosis,
levels fused, rhBMP-2 dose, complications, and fusion were assessed.<h4>Results</h4>Fifty-three
patients with a mean age of 55.7 years (range, 2-89 years) and an average follow-up
of 40 months (range, 25-80 months) met inclusion criteria. Surgical indications included
basilar invagination (n = 6), fracture (n = 6), atlantoaxial instability (n = 16),
kyphosis/kyphoscoliosis (n = 22), osteomyelitis (n = 1), spondylolisthesis (n = 1),
and cyst (n = 1). Fifteen patients had confirmed rheumatoid disease. The average rhBMP-2
dose was 1.8 mg per level, with a total of 282 levels treated (average, 5.3 levels;
SD, 2.8 levels). Among 53 patients, only 2 complications (3.8%) were identified: a
superficial wound infection and an adjacent-level degeneration. No cases of dysphagia
or neck swelling requiring treatment were identified. At the last follow-up, all patients
had achieved fusion.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Despite many of the patients in the present
series having complex pathology and/or rheumatoid arthritis, a 100% fusion rate was
achieved. Collectively, these data suggest that use of rhBMP-2 as an adjunct for posterior
cervical fusion is safe and effective at an average dose of 1.8 mg per level.
Type
Journal articleSubject
Cervical VertebraeHumans
Spinal Cord Diseases
Transforming Growth Factor beta
Recombinant Proteins
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Spinal Fusion
Retrospective Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Middle Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Male
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2
Young Adult
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29236Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1227/neu.0b013e318214a9b1Publication Info
Hamilton, D Kojo; Smith, Justin S; Reames, Davis L; Williams, Brian J; Chernavvsky,
Daniel R; & Shaffrey, Christopher I (2011). Safety, efficacy, and dosing of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 for
posterior cervical and cervicothoracic instrumented fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Neurosurgery, 69(1). pp. 103-111. 10.1227/neu.0b013e318214a9b1. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29236.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item recordScholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal
disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting
my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery
to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My
goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward
to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex s

Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info