Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography.
Date
2014-11
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
Objective
It remains unclear whether fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease with positive discography produces better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with discography-concordant lumbar degenerative disc disease electing for fusion versus nonoperative treatment.Methods
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with back pain and concordant lumbar discogram who were offered fusion. Follow-up questionnaires included pain score, Oswestry disability index, short form-12, and satisfaction scale. Patients were stratified based on whether they elected for fusion or nonoperative treatment.Results
Overall follow-up was 48% (96/200). Patients lacking follow-up were slightly older (P = 0.021) and less likely to be smokers (P = 0.013). Between patients with and without follow-up, there were no significant differences in pain score at initial visit, body mass index, or gender (P ≥ 0.40). The 96 patients for whom follow-up was obtained included 53 in the operative and 43 in the nonoperative groups. At baseline, there were no significant differences between these groups based on age, pain score, body mass index, smoking, or gender (P ≥ 0.25). Mean follow-up was 63 months for operative and 58 months for nonoperative patients (P = 0.20). The mean pain score at last follow-up improved significantly for operative and nonoperative patients (P < 0.001). At follow-up, operative and nonoperative groups did not differ significantly with regard to pain scores, Oswestry disability index, short form-12, or satisfaction scale.Conclusions
Comparison of long-term outcomes for patients with back pain and concordant discography did not demonstrate a significant difference in outcome measures of pain, health status, satisfaction, or disability based on whether the patient elected for fusion or nonoperative treatment.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Smith, Justin S, Gursukhman Sidhu, Ken Bode, David Gendelberg, Mitchell Maltenfort, David Ibrahimi, Christopher I Shaffrey, Alexander R Vaccaro, et al. (2014). Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography. World neurosurgery, 82(5). pp. 872–878. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.013 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28524.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.