Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography.

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Sidhu, Gursukhman

dc.contributor.author

Bode, Ken

dc.contributor.author

Gendelberg, David

dc.contributor.author

Maltenfort, Mitchell

dc.contributor.author

Ibrahimi, David

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Vaccaro, Alexander R

dc.date.accessioned

2023-07-20T19:59:31Z

dc.date.available

2023-07-20T19:59:31Z

dc.date.issued

2014-11

dc.date.updated

2023-07-20T19:58:17Z

dc.description.abstract

Objective

It remains unclear whether fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease with positive discography produces better outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with discography-concordant lumbar degenerative disc disease electing for fusion versus nonoperative treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with back pain and concordant lumbar discogram who were offered fusion. Follow-up questionnaires included pain score, Oswestry disability index, short form-12, and satisfaction scale. Patients were stratified based on whether they elected for fusion or nonoperative treatment.

Results

Overall follow-up was 48% (96/200). Patients lacking follow-up were slightly older (P = 0.021) and less likely to be smokers (P = 0.013). Between patients with and without follow-up, there were no significant differences in pain score at initial visit, body mass index, or gender (P ≥ 0.40). The 96 patients for whom follow-up was obtained included 53 in the operative and 43 in the nonoperative groups. At baseline, there were no significant differences between these groups based on age, pain score, body mass index, smoking, or gender (P ≥ 0.25). Mean follow-up was 63 months for operative and 58 months for nonoperative patients (P = 0.20). The mean pain score at last follow-up improved significantly for operative and nonoperative patients (P < 0.001). At follow-up, operative and nonoperative groups did not differ significantly with regard to pain scores, Oswestry disability index, short form-12, or satisfaction scale.

Conclusions

Comparison of long-term outcomes for patients with back pain and concordant discography did not demonstrate a significant difference in outcome measures of pain, health status, satisfaction, or disability based on whether the patient elected for fusion or nonoperative treatment.
dc.identifier

S1878-8750(13)01111-X

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8750

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8769

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28524

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

World neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.013

dc.subject

Lumbar Vertebrae

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

dc.subject

Disability Evaluation

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Retrospective Studies

dc.subject

Follow-Up Studies

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

dc.subject

Surveys and Questionnaires

dc.title

Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

872

pubs.end-page

878

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

82

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Operative and nonoperative treatment approaches for lumbar degenerative disc disease have similar long-term clinical outcomes among patients with positive discography..pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format