Telemedicine cardiovascular risk reduction in veterans: The CITIES trial.

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Olsen, Maren K

dc.contributor.author

McCant, Felicia

dc.contributor.author

Stechuchak, Karen M

dc.contributor.author

Danus, Susanne

dc.contributor.author

Crowley, Matthew J

dc.contributor.author

Goldstein, Karen M

dc.contributor.author

Zullig, Leah L

dc.contributor.author

Oddone, Eugene Z

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-26T01:16:56Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-26T01:16:56Z

dc.date.issued

2018-05

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:Comprehensive programs addressing tailored patient self-management and pharmacotherapy may reduce barriers to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction. METHODS:This is a 2-arm (clinical pharmacist specialist-delivered, telehealth intervention and education control) randomized controlled trial including Veterans with poorly controlled hypertension and/or hypercholesterolemia. Primary outcome was Framingham CVD risk score at 6 and 12 months, with systolic blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; low-density lipoprotein; high-density lipoprotein; body mass index; and, for those with diabetes, HbA1c as secondary outcomes. RESULTS:Among 428 Veterans, 50% were African American, 85% were men, and 33% had limited health literacy. Relative to the education control group, the clinical pharmacist specialist-delivered intervention did not show a reduction in CVD risk score at 6 months (-1.8, 95% CI -3.9 to 0.3; P = .10) or 12 months (-0.3, 95% CI -2.4 to 1.7; P = .74). No differences were seen in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or low-density lipoprotein at 6 or 12 months. We did observe a significant decline in total cholesterol at 6 months (-7.0, 95% CI -13.4 to -0.6; P = .03) in the intervention relative to education control group. Among patients in the intervention group, 34% received at least 5 of the 12 planned intervention calls and were considered "compliers." A sensitivity analysis of the "complier average causal effect" of intervention compared to control showed a mean difference in CVD risk score reduction of 5.7 (95% CI -12.0 to 0.7) at 6 months and -1.7 (95% CI -7.6 to 4.8) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS:Despite increased access to pharmacist resources, we did not observe significant improvements in CVD risk for patients randomized to the intervention compared to education control over 12 months. However, the intervention may have positive impact among those who actively participate, particularly in the short term.

dc.identifier

S0002-8703(18)30040-1

dc.identifier.issn

0002-8703

dc.identifier.issn

1097-6744

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29884

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

American heart journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.002

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Cardiovascular Diseases

dc.subject

Self Care

dc.subject

Risk Factors

dc.subject

Follow-Up Studies

dc.subject

Risk Reduction Behavior

dc.subject

Telemedicine

dc.subject

Blood Pressure

dc.subject

Time Factors

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Veterans

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Patient Education as Topic

dc.title

Telemedicine cardiovascular risk reduction in veterans: The CITIES trial.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

duke.contributor.orcid

Olsen, Maren K|0000-0002-9540-2103

duke.contributor.orcid

Crowley, Matthew J|0000-0002-6205-4536

duke.contributor.orcid

Goldstein, Karen M|0000-0003-4419-5869

duke.contributor.orcid

Zullig, Leah L|0000-0002-6638-409X

pubs.begin-page

122

pubs.end-page

129

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke - Margolis Center For Health Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Division of Biostatistics

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

199

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0002870318300401-main_11.pdf
Size:
894.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format