Ventilator Mode Does Not Influence Blood Loss or Transfusion Requirements During Major Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Thumbnail Image
View / Download254.67 KB

Date

2020-01

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

8
views
23
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Background

Blood loss during adult spinal deformity surgery is multifactorial. Anesthetic-related factors, such as mode of mechanical ventilation, may contribute to intraoperative blood loss. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of ventilator mode and ventilator parameters on intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing prone position spine surgery.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study examined electronic medical records of patients ≥18 years of age who underwent elective prone position spine surgery between May 2015 and June 2016. Associations between ventilator mode and ventilator parameters with intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate and platelet transfusions, and subfascial drain output were examined using multiple linear regression models controlling for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score, body mass index (BMI), preoperative blood coagulation parameters and laboratory values, operative levels, cage constructs, osteotomies, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions, laminectomies, reoperation, spine surgery invasiveness index, and operative time. In a secondary analysis, EBL, blood product transfusions, and postoperative drain output were compared between pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) propensity score-matched cohorts.

Results

Nine hundred forty-six records were reviewed, and 822 were included in the analysis. After adjusting for confounding, no statistically significant associations were observed between mode of ventilation and intraoperative EBL (estimate, -2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -248 to 245; P = .99) or blood product transfusions (PRBC: estimate, -9; 95% CI, -154 to 135; P = .90; FFP: estimate, -3; 95% CI, -59 to 54; P = .93; cryoprecipitate: estimate, -14; 95% CI, -70 to 43; P = .63; platelets: -7; 95% CI, -39 to 24; P = .64). After propensity score matching (n = 27 per group), no significant differences were observed in EBL (mean difference, 525 mL; 95% CI, -15 to 1065; P = .056) or blood transfusions (PRBC: mean difference, 208 mL; 95% CI, -23 to 439; P = .077; FFP (mean difference, 34 mL; 95% CI, -17 to 84; P = .19); cryoprecipitate (mean difference, 55 mL; 95% CI, -24 to 133; P = .17); or platelets (mean difference, 26 mL; 95% CI, -12 to 64; P = .18) between PCV and VCV groups.

Conclusions

In prone position spine surgery, neither mode of mechanical ventilation nor airway pressure is associated with intraoperative blood loss or need for allogeneic transfusion. Use of modern ventilation strategies using lung protective techniques may mitigate differences in blood loss previously observed between PCV and VCV modes.

Type

Journal article

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Spine, Humans, Blood Loss, Surgical, Treatment Outcome, Blood Transfusion, Respiration, Artificial, Orthopedic Procedures, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Retrospective Studies, Equipment Design, Ventilators, Mechanical, Prone Position, Time Factors, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Patient Positioning, Electronic Health Records

Citation

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28168

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1213/ane.0000000000004322

Publication Info

Dunn, Lauren K, Davis G Taylor, Ching-Jen Chen, Priyanka Singla, Lucas Fernández, Christopher H Wiedle, Mark F Hanak, Siny Tsang, et al. (2020). Ventilator Mode Does Not Influence Blood Loss or Transfusion Requirements During Major Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Anesthesia and analgesia, 130(1). pp. 100–110. 10.1213/ane.0000000000004322 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28168.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Collections

Scholarly Articles
Full item page

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.

Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.