Health and function of participants in the Long Life Family Study: A comparison with other cohorts.

Abstract

Individuals from families recruited for the Long Life Family Study (LLFS) (n= 4559) were examined and compared to individuals from other cohorts to determine whether the recruitment targeting longevity resulted in a cohort of individuals with better health and function. Other cohorts with similar data included the Cardiovascular Health Study, the Framingham Heart Study, and the New England Centenarian Study. Diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease and peripheral artery disease tended to be less common in LLFS probands and offspring compared to similar aged persons in the other cohorts. Pulse pressure and triglycerides were lower, high density lipids were higher, and a perceptual speed task and gait speed were better in LLFS. Age-specific comparisons showed differences that would be consistent with a higher peak, later onset of decline or slower rate of change across age in LLFS participants. These findings suggest several priority phenotypes for inclusion in future genetic analysis to identify loci contributing to exceptional survival.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.18632/aging.100242

Publication Info

Newman, Anne B, Nancy W Glynn, Christopher A Taylor, Paola Sebastiani, Thomas T Perls, Richard Mayeux, Kaare Christensen, Joseph M Zmuda, et al. (2011). Health and function of participants in the Long Life Family Study: A comparison with other cohorts. Aging (Albany NY), 3(1). pp. 63–76. 10.18632/aging.100242 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/14915.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Yashin

Anatoli I. Yashin

Research Professor in the Social Science Research Institute

Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.