Hydrologie and biotic influences on nitrate removal in a subtropical spring-fed river

dc.contributor.author

Heffernan, JB

dc.contributor.author

Cohen, MJ

dc.contributor.author

Frazer, TK

dc.contributor.author

Thomas, RG

dc.contributor.author

Rayfield, TJ

dc.contributor.author

Gulley, J

dc.contributor.author

Martin, JB

dc.contributor.author

Delfmo, JJ

dc.contributor.author

Graham, WD

dc.date.accessioned

2014-02-06T18:38:50Z

dc.date.issued

2010-01-01

dc.description.abstract

We use a long-term chemical and hydrologic record in combination with longitudinal sampling and highfrequency nitrate (NO3-) measurements from in situ sensors to describe temporal and spatial patterns of nitrogen (N) inputs and removal in the spring-fed Ichetucknee River (Columbia County, Florida) and to determine the hydrological, geomorphic, and biological factors that influence those dynamics. Over a 20-yr period of record, NO 3-N removal averaged 118 kg N d-1 (0.77 g N m-2 d-1 ) over the upper 5 km of the Ichetucknee River. Three independent estimates of gross autotrophic N assimilation (from gross primary production, diel NO3- variation, and standing biomass) agreed closely but accounted for less than 20% of observed N removal. Longitudinal surveys indicate negligible or negative dissolved organic nitrogen and ammonium (NH4+) production, suggesting that denitrification is the predominant mechanism of N removal in this river. A positive relationship between discharge and the magnitude of NO3-N removal shows that interactions with the surrounding floodplain exert considerable influence at high flows, and longitudinal NO3- patterns indicate that N removal may be influenced by channel morphology. These results suggest a greater role for dissimilatory processes and hydrologic connectivity with hyporheic and floodplain sediments than has been previously recognized in highly productive spring-fed rivers of north Florida. While hydrologic variation is the primary determinant of variation in NO 3- removal within the Ichetucknee River, comparison across systems indicates that biotic characteristics can cause significant deviation from predictions based on purely physical models of relationships between river size and N removal. © 2010 by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.

dc.identifier.issn

0024-3590

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8364

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Limnology and Oceanography

dc.title

Hydrologie and biotic influences on nitrate removal in a subtropical spring-fed river

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Heffernan, JB|0000-0001-7641-9949

pubs.begin-page

249

pubs.end-page

263

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

55

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Heffernan et al 2010 Hydrologic and biotic influences on N removal.pdf
Size:
1.83 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version