Preclinical Evaluation of a Novel Steerable Robotic Neuroendoscope Tool

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:</jats:title> <jats:p>To improve the outcomes of minimally invasive, endoscopic, intracranial procedures, steerable robotic tools have been developed but still require thorough evaluation before use in a clinical setting. This paper compares a novel steerable robotic neuroendoscope tool against a standard rigid tool.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Seventeen participants, 8 nonmedical and 9 medical (neurosurgery residents and fellows), were recruited. The evaluation trial consisted of a task that was completed using either a rigid tool or the steerable tool, followed by the completion of a qualitative survey. Target reach time and tool movement volume (TMV) were recorded for each trial and analyzed. The tools were evaluated within a realistic phantom model of the brain.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Preclinical evaluation of both tools showed that average target reach time for the steerable tool among medical personnel (15.0 seconds) was longer than that of the rigid tool (5.9 seconds). However, the average TMV for the steerable tool (0.178 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) was much lower than that of the rigid tool (0.501 cm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) for medical personnel, decreasing the TMV by 64.47%.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSION:</jats:title> <jats:p>The steerable tool required more training and practice in comparison with the standard rigid tool, but it decreased the overall endoscope movement volume, which is a source of parenchymal injury associated with endoscopic procedures.</jats:p> </jats:sec>