An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four-dimensional computed tomography images.

dc.contributor.author

Cui, Guoqiang

dc.contributor.author

Jew, Brian

dc.contributor.author

Hong, Julian C

dc.contributor.author

Johnston, Eric W

dc.contributor.author

Loo, Billy W

dc.contributor.author

Maxim, Peter G

dc.date.accessioned

2019-07-09T11:37:29Z

dc.date.available

2019-07-09T11:37:29Z

dc.date.issued

2012-11-08

dc.date.updated

2019-07-09T11:37:28Z

dc.description.abstract

The aim of this study is to develop an automated method to objectively compare motion artifacts in two four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) image sets, and identify the one that would appear to human observers with fewer or smaller artifacts. Our proposed method is based on the difference of the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at couch transitions, which we hypothesize may be a suitable metric to identify motion artifacts. We evaluated our method using ten pairs of 4D CT image sets that showed subtle differences in artifacts between images in a pair, which were identifiable by human observers. One set of 4D CT images was sorted using breathing traces in which our clinically implemented 4D CT sorting software miscalculated the respiratory phase, which expectedly led to artifacts in the images. The other set of images consisted of the same images; however, these were sorted using the same breathing traces but with corrected phases. Next we calculated the normalized correlation coefficients between edge slices at all couch transitions for all respiratory phases in both image sets to evaluate for motion artifacts. For nine image set pairs, our method identified the 4D CT sets sorted using the breathing traces with the corrected respiratory phase to result in images with fewer or smaller artifacts, whereas for one image pair, no difference was noted. Two observers independently assessed the accuracy of our method. Both observers identified 9 image sets that were sorted using the breathing traces with corrected respiratory phase as having fewer or smaller artifacts. In summary, using the 4D CT data of ten pairs of 4D CT image sets, we have demonstrated proof of principle that our method is able to replicate the results of two human observers in identifying the image set with fewer or smaller artifacts.

dc.identifier.issn

1526-9914

dc.identifier.issn

1526-9914

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19086

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of applied clinical medical physics

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3838

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

dc.subject

Observer Variation

dc.subject

Artifacts

dc.subject

Respiratory Mechanics

dc.subject

Algorithms

dc.subject

Motion

dc.subject

Automation

dc.subject

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography

dc.title

An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four-dimensional computed tomography images.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Cui, Guoqiang|0000-0002-6607-3830

duke.contributor.orcid

Hong, Julian C|0000-0001-5172-6889

pubs.begin-page

3838

pubs.issue

6

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Radiation Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

13

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
An automated method for comparing motion artifacts in cine four-dimensional computed tomography images.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format