A comparison of COVID-19 and imaging radiation risk in clinical patient populations.
dc.contributor.author | Ria, Francesco | |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Wanyi | |
dc.contributor.author | Chalian, Hamid | |
dc.contributor.author | Abadi, Ehsan | |
dc.contributor.author | Segars, Paul W | |
dc.contributor.author | Fricks, Rafael | |
dc.contributor.author | Khoshpouri, Pegah | |
dc.contributor.author | Samei, Ehsan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-08T16:12:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-08T16:12:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10-07 | |
dc.date.updated | 2020-10-08T16:12:55Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: The outbreak of coronavirus SARS-COV2 affected more than 180 countries necessitating fast and accurate diagnostic tools. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been identified as a gold standard test with Chest CT and Chest Radiography showing promising results as well. However, radiological solutions have not been used extensively for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease, partly due to radiation risk. This study aimed to provide quantitative comparison of imaging radiation risk versus COVID risk. METHODS: The analysis was performed in terms of mortality rate per age group. COVID-19 mortality was extracted from epidemiological data across 299,004 patients published by ISS-Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 in Italy. For radiological risk, the study considered 659 Chest CT performed in adult patients. Organ doses were estimated using a Monte Carlo method and then used to calculate Risk Index that was converted into an upper bound for related mortality rate following NCI-SEER data. RESULTS: COVID-19 mortality showed a rapid rise for ages >30 years old (min:0.30%; max:30.20%), whereas only 1 death was reported in the analyzed patient cohort for ages <20 years old. The rates decreased for radiation risk across age groups. The median mortality rate across all ages for Chest-CT and Chest-Radiography were 0.007% (min:0.005%; max:0.011%) and 0.0003% (min:0.0002%; max:0.0004%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19, Chest Radiography, and Chest CT mortality rates showed different magnitudes and trends across age groups. In higher ages, the risk of COVID-19 far outweighs that of radiological exams. Based on risk comparison alone, Chest Radiography and CT for COVID-19 care is justified for patients older than 20 and 30 years old, respectively. Notwithstanding other aspects of diagnosis, the present results capture a component of risk consideration associated with the use of imaging for COVID. Once integrated with other diagnostic factors, they may help inform better management of the pandemic. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-4746 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1361-6498 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing | |
dc.relation.ispartof | J Radiol Prot | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1088/1361-6498/abbf3b | |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
dc.subject | X-ray Computed Tomography | |
dc.subject | X-ray Radiography | |
dc.subject | mortality | |
dc.subject | radiation risk | |
dc.title | A comparison of COVID-19 and imaging radiation risk in clinical patient populations. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Ria, Francesco|0000-0001-5902-7396 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Abadi, Ehsan|0000-0002-9123-5854 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Samei, Ehsan|0000-0001-7451-3309 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Staff | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Radiology | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.publication-status | Published online |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- Ria_et_al_covid-19_risk_assessment_JRP.pdf
- Size:
- 846.16 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Accepted version