A comparison of COVID-19 and imaging radiation risk in clinical patient populations.

dc.contributor.author

Ria, Francesco

dc.contributor.author

Fu, Wanyi

dc.contributor.author

Chalian, Hamid

dc.contributor.author

Abadi, Ehsan

dc.contributor.author

Segars, Paul W

dc.contributor.author

Fricks, Rafael

dc.contributor.author

Khoshpouri, Pegah

dc.contributor.author

Samei, Ehsan

dc.date.accessioned

2020-10-08T16:12:56Z

dc.date.available

2020-10-08T16:12:56Z

dc.date.issued

2020-10-07

dc.date.updated

2020-10-08T16:12:55Z

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: The outbreak of coronavirus SARS-COV2 affected more than 180 countries necessitating fast and accurate diagnostic tools. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been identified as a gold standard test with Chest CT and Chest Radiography showing promising results as well. However, radiological solutions have not been used extensively for the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease, partly due to radiation risk. This study aimed to provide quantitative comparison of imaging radiation risk versus COVID risk. METHODS: The analysis was performed in terms of mortality rate per age group. COVID-19 mortality was extracted from epidemiological data across 299,004 patients published by ISS-Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 in Italy. For radiological risk, the study considered 659 Chest CT performed in adult patients. Organ doses were estimated using a Monte Carlo method and then used to calculate Risk Index that was converted into an upper bound for related mortality rate following NCI-SEER data. RESULTS: COVID-19 mortality showed a rapid rise for ages >30 years old (min:0.30%; max:30.20%), whereas only 1 death was reported in the analyzed patient cohort for ages <20 years old. The rates decreased for radiation risk across age groups. The median mortality rate across all ages for Chest-CT and Chest-Radiography were 0.007% (min:0.005%; max:0.011%) and 0.0003% (min:0.0002%; max:0.0004%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19, Chest Radiography, and Chest CT mortality rates showed different magnitudes and trends across age groups. In higher ages, the risk of COVID-19 far outweighs that of radiological exams. Based on risk comparison alone, Chest Radiography and CT for COVID-19 care is justified for patients older than 20 and 30 years old, respectively. Notwithstanding other aspects of diagnosis, the present results capture a component of risk consideration associated with the use of imaging for COVID. Once integrated with other diagnostic factors, they may help inform better management of the pandemic.

dc.identifier.issn

0952-4746

dc.identifier.issn

1361-6498

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/21590

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

IOP Publishing

dc.relation.ispartof

J Radiol Prot

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1088/1361-6498/abbf3b

dc.subject

COVID-19

dc.subject

X-ray Computed Tomography

dc.subject

X-ray Radiography

dc.subject

mortality

dc.subject

radiation risk

dc.title

A comparison of COVID-19 and imaging radiation risk in clinical patient populations.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Ria, Francesco|0000-0001-5902-7396

duke.contributor.orcid

Abadi, Ehsan|0000-0002-9123-5854

duke.contributor.orcid

Samei, Ehsan|0000-0001-7451-3309

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Radiology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published online

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ria_et_al_covid-19_risk_assessment_JRP.pdf
Size:
846.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version