Incorporating Case-Based Reasoning for Radiation Therapy Knowledge Modeling: A Pelvic Case Study.

dc.contributor.author

Sheng, Yang

dc.contributor.author

Zhang, Jiahan

dc.contributor.author

Wang, Chunhao

dc.contributor.author

Yin, Fang-Fang

dc.contributor.author

Wu, Q Jackie

dc.contributor.author

Ge, Yaorong

dc.date.accessioned

2019-10-01T13:54:12Z

dc.date.available

2019-10-01T13:54:12Z

dc.date.issued

2019-01

dc.date.updated

2019-10-01T13:54:11Z

dc.description.abstract

Knowledge models in radiotherapy capture the relation between patient anatomy and dosimetry to provide treatment planning guidance. When treatment schemes evolve, existing models struggle to predict accurately. We propose a case-based reasoning framework designed to handle novel anatomies that are of same type but vary beyond original training samples. A total of 105 pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy cases were analyzed. Eighty cases were prostate cases while the other 25 were prostate-plus-lymph-node cases. We simulated 4 scenarios: Scarce scenario, Semiscarce scenario, Semiample scenario, and Ample scenario. For the Scarce scenario, a multiple stepwise regression model was trained using 85 cases (80 prostate, 5 prostate-plus-lymph-node). The proposed workflow started with evaluating the feature novelty of new cases against 5 training prostate-plus-lymph-node cases using leverage statistic. The case database was composed of a 5-case dose atlas. Case-based dose prediction was compared against the regression model prediction using sum of squared residual. Mean sum of squared residual of case-based and regression predictions for the bladder of 13 identified outliers were 0.174 ± 0.166 and 0.459 ± 0.508, respectively (P = .0326). For the rectum, the respective mean sum of squared residuals were 0.103 ± 0.120 and 0.150 ± 0.171 for case-based and regression prediction (P = .1972). By retaining novel cases, under the Ample scenario, significant statistical improvement was observed over the Scarce scenario (P = .0398) for the bladder model. We expect that the incorporation of case-based reasoning that judiciously applies appropriate predictive models could improve overall prediction accuracy and robustness in clinical practice.

dc.identifier.issn

1533-0346

dc.identifier.issn

1533-0338

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19363

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Technology in cancer research & treatment

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/1533033819874788

dc.subject

case-based reasoning

dc.subject

knowledge modeling

dc.subject

prostate cancer

dc.subject

radiation therapy

dc.title

Incorporating Case-Based Reasoning for Radiation Therapy Knowledge Modeling: A Pelvic Case Study.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Sheng, Yang|0000-0003-3380-1966

duke.contributor.orcid

Yin, Fang-Fang|0000-0002-2025-4740|0000-0003-1064-2149

pubs.begin-page

1533033819874788

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University Faculty

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Kunshan University

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Radiation Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

18

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sheng pelvic data.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format