Incorporating Case-Based Reasoning for Radiation Therapy Knowledge Modeling: A Pelvic Case Study.
dc.contributor.author | Sheng, Yang | |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Jiahan | |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Chunhao | |
dc.contributor.author | Yin, Fang-Fang | |
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Q Jackie | |
dc.contributor.author | Ge, Yaorong | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-01T13:54:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-01T13:54:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | |
dc.date.updated | 2019-10-01T13:54:11Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Knowledge models in radiotherapy capture the relation between patient anatomy and dosimetry to provide treatment planning guidance. When treatment schemes evolve, existing models struggle to predict accurately. We propose a case-based reasoning framework designed to handle novel anatomies that are of same type but vary beyond original training samples. A total of 105 pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy cases were analyzed. Eighty cases were prostate cases while the other 25 were prostate-plus-lymph-node cases. We simulated 4 scenarios: Scarce scenario, Semiscarce scenario, Semiample scenario, and Ample scenario. For the Scarce scenario, a multiple stepwise regression model was trained using 85 cases (80 prostate, 5 prostate-plus-lymph-node). The proposed workflow started with evaluating the feature novelty of new cases against 5 training prostate-plus-lymph-node cases using leverage statistic. The case database was composed of a 5-case dose atlas. Case-based dose prediction was compared against the regression model prediction using sum of squared residual. Mean sum of squared residual of case-based and regression predictions for the bladder of 13 identified outliers were 0.174 ± 0.166 and 0.459 ± 0.508, respectively (P = .0326). For the rectum, the respective mean sum of squared residuals were 0.103 ± 0.120 and 0.150 ± 0.171 for case-based and regression prediction (P = .1972). By retaining novel cases, under the Ample scenario, significant statistical improvement was observed over the Scarce scenario (P = .0398) for the bladder model. We expect that the incorporation of case-based reasoning that judiciously applies appropriate predictive models could improve overall prediction accuracy and robustness in clinical practice. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1533-0346 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1533-0338 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Technology in cancer research & treatment | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1177/1533033819874788 | |
dc.subject | case-based reasoning | |
dc.subject | knowledge modeling | |
dc.subject | prostate cancer | |
dc.subject | radiation therapy | |
dc.title | Incorporating Case-Based Reasoning for Radiation Therapy Knowledge Modeling: A Pelvic Case Study. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Sheng, Yang|0000-0003-3380-1966 | |
duke.contributor.orcid | Yin, Fang-Fang|0000-0002-2025-4740|0000-0003-1064-2149 | |
pubs.begin-page | 1533033819874788 | |
pubs.organisational-group | School of Medicine | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Kunshan University Faculty | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Kunshan University | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Cancer Institute | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Centers | |
pubs.organisational-group | Radiation Oncology | |
pubs.organisational-group | Clinical Science Departments | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 18 |