A Policymaking Process "Tug-of-War": National Information Security Policies in Comparative Perspective
Repository Usage Stats
There is tension between the ideal of government transparency and the need to protect vital information. What types of information do governments protect on national security grounds? What arguments do governments use to justify the protection of this information? What will influence an open government information policy as opposed to a closed information policy? Through an examination of more than 250 information security-related policies from around the world, it is clear that (a) all governments limit the flows of information, (b) there are different reasons for this, and (c) the reasons are not always correlated to government type. In other words, sometimes democracies and authoritarian countries limit the same types of information issues. The policies and policy discussions are dependent on a variety of actors and which actor(s) wield the strongest influence at the time, which makes them often get caught up in a policy "tug-of-war" that most often results in incremental policy change and implementation. © 2013 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Rogerson, K, and D Milton (2013). A Policymaking Process "Tug-of-War": National Information Security Policies in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 10(4). pp. 462–476. 10.1080/19331681.2013.843989 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30141.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.