Optimization of reduced-dose MDCT of thoracic aorta using iterative reconstruction.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of iterative reconstruction on image quality of reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: A torso phantom was scanned using two tube potentials (80 and 120 kVp) and five different tube currents (110, 75, 40, 20, and 10 mAs). All images were reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction. Aortic attenuation, image noise within the thoracic aorta, signal-to-noise ratio, and sharpness of the aortic wall were quantified in the phantom for the two reconstruction algorithms. Data were analyzed using paired t test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The aortic attenuation was similar for FBP and iterative reconstruction (P > 0.05). Image noise level was lower (P < 0.0001), and image sharpness was higher (P = 0.046) with iterative reconstruction. Signal-to-noise ratios were higher with iterative reconstruction compared with those with FBP (P < 0.0001). Signal-to-noise ratio at 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction (9.8 ± 4.4) was similar to the signal-to-noise ratio at 120 kVp with FBP (8.4 ± 3.3) (P = 0.196). CONCLUSIONS: Less image noise and higher image sharpness may be achieved with iterative reconstruction in reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1097/rct.0b013e3182a213cd

Publication Info

Töre, Hüseyin Gürkan, Pegah Entezari, Hamid Chalian, Fernanda Dias Gonzalez-Guindalini, Marcos Paulo Ferreira Botelho and Vahid Yaghmai (2014). Optimization of reduced-dose MDCT of thoracic aorta using iterative reconstruction. Journal of computer assisted tomography, 38(1). pp. 72–76. 10.1097/rct.0b013e3182a213cd Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18299.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.